TOTOWA, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: JJM PACKAGING LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JJM PACKAGING LLC in 20 F COMMERCE WAY, TOTOWA, NJ 07512 (NAICS 326112). OSHA activity number 347359937.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JJM PACKAGING LLC
- Site address
- 20 F COMMERCE WAY
- City
- TOTOWA
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07512
- Mailing
- 20 F COMMERCE WAY, TOTOWA, NJ 07512
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326112
- Employees
- 120
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.28 B01 I
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $15,970 · Current $9,901 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by one or more of the following: Guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a) Matrix Bagger #12: An employee was exposed to an approximately 5-foot fall hazard throughout the day while cleaning the hopper with air. The employee was standing on top of the electric panel box that controls the machine, on or about 4/17/24. b) Matrix Bagger#12 Employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10' 11" while working on a catwalk without utilizing fall protection. The guardrail was not being utilized, on or about 4/17/24.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $9901.4
- — Z (S) $15970
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $13,690 · Current $8,488 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit routes were not free and unobstructed. Materials or equipment were placed, either permanently or temporarily, within the exit route. a) At the facility, 20 Commerce Way Totowa NJ: Employees were exposed to fire hazards, when the exit route was not free and unobstructed in the storage Area. Fire exit route was blocked by pallets full of food, on or about 3/19/24. b) At the facility, 20 Commerce Way Totowa NJ: Employees were exposed to fire hazards, when the exit route was not free and unobstructed in the storage Area. Fire exit route was blocked by pallets full of food, on or about 3/20/24. c) At the facility, 20 Commerce Way Totowa NJ: Employees were exposed to fire hazards, when the exit route was not free and unobstructed in the storage Area. Fire exit route was blocked by pallets full of food, on or about 3/21/24.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $8487.8
- — Z (S) $13690
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $9,126 · Current $5,658 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Batching room: Employee assigned to mix products. The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program, on or about 3/19/24.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5658.12
- — Z (S) $9126
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Batching room: Employees assigned to conduct operations is required to wear respiratory protection and had not completed a medical evaluation. The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, on or about 3/19/24.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) Facility: Employees are required to wear a 3M half-mask dual cartridge respirator while conducting operations. The employer did not ensure that employees completed fit testing prior to initial use of respirators, on or about 3/19/24.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: a) Batching room: Employees assigned to conduct operations is required to wear respiratory protection. The employer did not conduct training on the use, maintenance and limitations of respiratory protection, on or about 3/19/24
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $13,690 · Current $8,488 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a) At the facility, 20 Commerce Way Totowa NJ: Employees were allowed to operate a powered industrial truck without successful completion of training or evaluation, on or about 3/19/24.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $8487.8
- — Z (S) $13690
1910.303 G01
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $9,126 · Current $5,658 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment a) Facility: garbage and metal cars and other items were stored in front of an electrical panel, blocking access to the panel box operating at 208 volts, on or about 3/19/24.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5658.12
- — Z (S) $9126
More inspections at JJM Packaging LLC
View JJM Packaging LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326112)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347359937.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.