LITTLETON, MA —
OSHA Inspection: LAB 9 MODULAR LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LAB 9 MODULAR LLC in 53 AYER ROAD, BAY 4, LITTLETON, MA 01460 (NAICS 321991). OSHA activity number 347386450.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LAB 9 MODULAR LLC
- Site address
- 53 AYER ROAD, BAY 4
- City
- LITTLETON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01460
- Mailing
- 53 AYER ROAD, BAY 4., LITTLETON, MA 01460
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321991
- Employees
- 26
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C11
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $11,292
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(11): The employer did not ensure that portable ladders used to gain access to an upper landing surface that have side rails that extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface. Location - Manufacturing floor. On or about April 9, 2024, an employee was not protected from falling greater than twelve feet while using an A-Frame ladder that did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $11292
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.25 C02
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.25(c)(2):29 CFR 1910.25(c)(2): The employer did not ensure that standard stairs have a maximum riser height of 9.5 inches (24 cm). Location - Manufacturing floor. On or about April 9, 2024, several employees were exposed to fall hazards were stair steps/ step platforms were not used when the step rise was greater than 9.5" inches in height.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4839
- — Z (S) $4839
1910.28 B01 I
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $11,292
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Except as provided elsewhere in this section 29 CFR 1910.28, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by one or more of the systems described in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i). Location - Left side of building. On or about April 9, 2024, an employee was not protected from falling while working/walking on a modular roof at a height greater than twelve feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $11292
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.30 A01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $11,292
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.30(a): The employer did not provide training for each employee who uses personal fall protection systems or who is required to be trained as specified elsewhere in this subpart before any employee is exposed to a fall hazard. And/or the employer did not ensure employees are trained in the requirements of this paragraph on or before May 17, 2017. Location - Manufacturing floor. On or about April 9, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees exposed to fall hazards were properly trained.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $11292
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.178 A05
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $11,292
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered. Location - Manufacturing floor. On or about April 9, 2024, three powered industrial truck (PIT) attachments were not listed on the data plate of the Toyota PIT.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $11292
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $11,292
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): Location - Manufacturing floor and outside. On or about April 9, 2024, employees operate two powered industrial trucks without training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $11292
- — Z (S) $11292
More inspections at LAB 9 Modular LLC
View LAB 9 Modular LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321991)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347386450.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.