Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LINING EXTERIOR & CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LINING EXTERIOR & CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 708 S. AMY DRIVE, MAHOMET, IL 61853 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347496762.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lining Exterior & Construction, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lining Exterior & Construction, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
708 S. AMY DRIVE
City
MAHOMET
State
IL
ZIP
61853
Mailing
129 DEWEY STREET, URBANA, IL 61802
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2024
Abate by
Jul 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2):  The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  On or about May 21, 2024, an employee was exposed to overhead hazards without head protection, while working on the first story under an employee on the second story, on a residential construction site in Mahomet, Illinois.  The employer did not provide employee safety training in order to provide the employee with the knowledge to recognize construction safety hazards, as well as the procedures to follow in order to minimize or eliminate those safety hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2765
  • — I (S) $1659
  • — Z (S) $2765

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2024
Abate by
Jul 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.100(a):  Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  On or about May 21, 2024, an employee was exposed to overhead hazards without head protection, while working on the first story under an employee on the second story, on a residential construction site in Mahomet, Illinois.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2024
Abate by
Jul 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    On or about May 21, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards in excess of 10 feet without all protection, on a residential construction site in Mahomet, Illinois.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $4839
  • — I (S) $2903.8
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2024
Abate by
Jul 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):  The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about May 21, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards in excess of 10 feet without fall protection, on a residential construction site in Mahomet, Illinois.   The employer did not provide construction safety training to employees, in order to provide them with the knowledge necessary to recognize the hazards of falling and the safety requirements associated with fall protection, as well as the proper work procedures to follow, in order to minimize and eliminate the fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2024
Abate by
Jul 10, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,457 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):  The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  On or about May 21, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards and overhead hazards, on a residential construction site in Mahomet, Illinois.  The employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employees' activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2024
Abate by
Jul 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):  The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  On or about May 21, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards and overhead hazards, on a residential construction site in Mahomet, Illinois.  The employer did not have a competent person conducting frequent and periodic safety inspections at the construction site.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2024
Abate by
Jul 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,457 · Current $3,457
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):  Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    On or about May 21, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards in excess of 10 feet, while accessing and exiting the roof via an extension ladder that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface of the roof, on a residential construction site in Mahomet, Illinois.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $3457
  • — I (S) $2074.2
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2024
Abate by
Jul 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a):  The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:   On or about May 21, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards in excess of 10 feet, while accessing and exiting the roof via an extension ladder that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface of the roof, on a residential construction site in Mahomet, Illinois.    The employer did not provide construction safety training to employees, in order to provide them with the knowledge necessary to recognize the hazards related to ladders, as well as the proper work procedures to follow, in order to minimize and eliminate these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Lining Exterior & Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347496762.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.