EAST HARTFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: CPB HOLDINGS, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CPB HOLDINGS, LLC in 95 LEGGETT STREET, EAST HARTFORD, CT 06108 (NAICS 322211). OSHA activity number 347497828.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CPB HOLDINGS, LLC
- Site address
- 95 LEGGETT STREET
- City
- EAST HARTFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06108
- Mailing
- 95 LEGGETT STREET, EAST HARTFORD, CT 06108
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 322211
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): Production Floor: On, or about, May 21, 2024, the employer had not conducted a Hazard Assessment to determine what personal protective equipment was required for employees who operated printing equipment and who performed maintenance, set-up and cleaning tasks on and around printing equipment.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2000
- — C (S) $2765
- — Z (S) $2765
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: Production Floor: On, or about, May 21, 2024, employees who used press cleaning chemicals such as, but not limited to, Gotham Ink Water Works Cleaner 21 and 18-M Cleaner & MRC, both of which could cause eye damage, were not provided with protective eyewear. Also, employees did not wear eye protection while operating and maintaining printing equipment.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: Production Floor: On, or about, May 15, 2024, the employer had not developed and implemented a Lockout/Tagout program to protect employees during servicing and maintenance tasks for machinery and equipment in the plant. Abatement Note: Tasks other than normal production operations such as clearing jams and machine adjustments are covered under the scope of the lockout/tagout regulation but may be accomplished with alternative procedures depending on the press control system and the type of safeguarding provided on the press.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2000
- — C (S) $3457
- — Z (S) $3457
1910.1200 E01 II
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,074 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(ii): The written hazard communication program did not include the methods the employer would use to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks, and the hazards associated with chemicals contained in unlabeled pipes in their work areas: Production Area: On, or about, May 21, 2024, the employer's written Hazard Communication program did not address non-routine tasks.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2000
- — C (S) $2074
- — Z (S) $2074
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical: Production Area: On, or about, May 21, 2024, secondary containers that contained Gotham Inks Water Works Cleaner 21, a press wash that could cause eye damage and 18-M Cleaner & MRC, a Category 2 flammable liquid with a flashpoint of 0�, F that could also cause eye damage and skin irritation were not provided with labels and/or marking that included a product identifier and appropriate hazard warnings.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s): Production Area: On, or about, May 21, 2024, safety data sheets for chemicals used in the production area were not located where employees had access to them. They were maintained in the front office that was located in an adjacent building. Also, the Safety Data Sheet binder did not contain a Safety Data Sheet for 18-M Cleaner, a Category 2 flammable liquid with a flashpoint of 0�, F.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at CPB Holdings, LLC
View CPB Holdings, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 322211)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347497828.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.