Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ANDRES GARCIA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ANDRES GARCIA in 1874 PAPA MORI DRIVE, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78414 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 347503807.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Andres Garcia — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Andres Garcia is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ANDRES GARCIA
Site address
1874 PAPA MORI DRIVE
City
CORPUS CHRISTI
State
TX
ZIP
78414
Mailing
6305 ERSKINE DRIVE, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78412
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2024
Abate by
Nov 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $5,323 · Current $5,323
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.   On or about May 22, 2024, and at times prior thereto, central elevated area of a residential dwelling under construction, an employee utilized a pneumatic nail gun without personal protective equipment for the eyes while performing framing/rafters, construction, work activity.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5323

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2024
Abate by
Dec 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $5,323 · Current $5,323
29 CFR  1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):   On or about May 22, 2024, and at times prior thereto, central elevated area of a residential dwelling under construction, an employee utilized an elevated scaffold platform without adequate planks and or decking between the uprights and the guardrail supports, while performing construction frame/rafter work activity.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5323

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2024
Abate by
Dec 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $5,323 · Current $5,323
29 CFR  1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Cross braces were used as a means of access:   On or about May 22, 2024, and times prior there to, central elevated area of a residential dwelling under construction, an employee utilized a scaffold platform without access while performing construction frame/rafter work activity.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5323

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2024
Abate by
Nov 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $5,323 · Current $5,323
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   On or about May 22, 2024, and times prior thereto, employer performed construction framing activity at a height greater than six feet without fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5323

View Andres Garcia's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347503807.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.