Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FENIX ROOFING & CONSTRUCTION INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FENIX ROOFING & CONSTRUCTION INC. in 5 MUGGETT HILL RD., CHARLTON, MA 01507 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347520439.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fenix Roofing & Construction INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fenix Roofing & Construction INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5 MUGGETT HILL RD.
City
CHARLTON
State
MA
ZIP
01507
Mailing
11 COLONIAL RD. APT 7, MILFORD, MA 01757
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):  The employer did not ensure employees used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  5 Muggett Hill Rd., Charlton, MA: On or about May 31, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees using pneumatic nail guns were protected from flying particles  during a residential construction project that involved shingle replacement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.502 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.502(d):  The employer used body belts as part of a personal fall arrest system:  5 Muggett Hill Rd., Charlton, MA: On or about May 31, 2024, an employee installing shingles during a residential construction project was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 11 feet 3 inches, while wearing a body belt attached to a lanyard as part of a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.502 D17

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(17):  The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head:  5 Muggett Hill Rd., Charlton, MA: On or about May 31, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees using personal fall arrest systems had their lanyards attached to their harness at a point on or near the wearer's back, while working at heights between 11 feet 3 inches and 21 feet during a residential construction project involving shingle replacement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2024
Abate by
Jan 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  5 Muggett Hill Rd. Charlton, MA: On or about May 31, 2024, the employer had not trained employees who were exposed to fall hazards while performing work on a roof, to recognize fall hazards and on the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):  Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  5 Muggett Hill Rd. Charlton, MA: On or about May 31, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees using ladders to access heights of approximately 11 feet 3 inches above the ground below, had the ladder rails extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $4839

View Fenix Roofing & Construction INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347520439.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.