OSHA Inspection: EDWARD SANCHEZ

Issued

Jul 12, 2024

Penalty

Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  a)  At 1638 Fenton Circle, Lot 117 River Oaks, Foley, Alabama:  On June 6, 2024; the employer allowed his employees to operate pneumatic nail guns without eye protection while performing roofing activities exposing his employees to struck-by hazards.

Issued

Jul 12, 2024

Penalty

Initial $4,148 · Current $4,148

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a)  At 1638 Fenton Circle, Lot 117 River Oaks, Foley, Alabama:  On June 6, 2024; the employer allowed his employees to perform roofing activities without fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of up to 12 feet 10 inches to the ground below.

Issued

Jul 12, 2024

Abate by

Jul 26, 2024

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a)  At 1638 Fenton Circle, Lot 117 River Oaks, Foley, Alabama:  On June 6, 2024; the employer allowed his employees to perform roofing activities without first ensuring his employees were trained on the hazards associated with falls to include but not limited to setting up and inspecting fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of up to 12 feet 10 inches to the ground below.

Issued

Jul 12, 2024

Penalty

Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a)  At 1638 Fenton Circle, Lot 117 River Oaks, Foley, Alabama:  On June 6, 2024; the employer allowed his employees to use an extension ladder to gain access to the roof and the rails of the ladder did not extend three feet above the roof landing to provide safe access exposing his employees to a fall hazard of 10 feet 2 inches to the ground below.