Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DE ALMEIDA CARPENTRY CORP

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DE ALMEIDA CARPENTRY CORP in ALFRED RD, KENNEBUNK, ME 04043 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 347599193.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch DE Almeida Carpentry Corp — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for DE Almeida Carpentry Corp is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
ALFRED RD
City
KENNEBUNK
State
ME
ZIP
04043
Mailing
363 CONCORD STREET, FRAMINGHAM, MA 01702
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2024
Abate by
Dec 10, 2024
Penalty
Initial $427 · Current $427
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer failed to certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation had been abated:  Kennebunk, Maine - The employer failed to certify abatement of Citation 1 Item 2 and Citation 3 Item 1.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $427

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2024
Abate by
Dec 10, 2024
Penalty
Initial $427 · Current $427
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is completed for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  Kennebunk, Maine - The employer failed to certify abatement of Citation 1 Item 1 and Citation 2 Item 1.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $427

1926.300 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2024
Abate by
Oct 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.300(a): Hand tools, power tools, or similar equipment were not maintained in a safe condition:  Worksite - The employer failed to maintain the condition of the Makita-powered circular saw by allowing employees to use the tool with a damaged cord.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2024
Abate by
Oct 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Ladders were used on surfaces which were not stable and level:  Porch - The employer did not ensure the porch surface on which two step ladders were placed was secure and level, as the plywood that was laid down on the porch was not secure.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2024
Penalty
Initial $5,323 · Current $5,323
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:  Porch - The employer failed to prevent workers from standing on the top step of a self-supporting ladder was placed on the unfinished raised front porch of the structure with unsecure floorboards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5323

1926.501 B13

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2024
Abate by
Oct 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $35,491 · Current $35,491
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee's engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Roof - The employer allowed employees to work on a steep roof approximately 15 feet from the lower level with no method for protection from falls.  The De Almeida Carpentry Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1632420, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on February 23, 2023, with respect to a workplace located at 118 East Main Street, Merrimac, Massachusetts 01860.  The De Almeida Carpentry Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1739990, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on August 8, 2024, with respect to a workplace located at 60 Sherburne Ave, Tyngsboro, Massachusetts 01879.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (W) $35491

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2024
Abate by
Oct 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify fall protection training by preparing a written certification record:   Office - The employer did not verify fall protection training by preparing a written certification record.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View DE Almeida Carpentry Corp's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347599193.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.