OAK CREEK, WI —
OSHA Inspection: ANNA MARIA BARRERA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ANNA MARIA BARRERA in 3243 EAST JAMES DRIVE, OAK CREEK, WI 53154 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347613077.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANNA MARIA BARRERA
- Site address
- 3243 EAST JAMES DRIVE
- City
- OAK CREEK
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53154
- Mailing
- 3817 NORTH 24TH STREET, MILWAUKEE, WI 53206
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2024
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) (a) On or about July 12, 2024, the employer did not ensure frequent and regular inspections of the job site were conducted by a competent person to ensure hazardous conditions were found and corrected.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: (a) On or about July 12, 2024, the employer did not ensure employees were protected by a protective helmet. Employees were exposed to a possible danger of head injury from impact or from falling or flying objects, while working below employees tearing off roofing material from the second story roof of an existing residential property.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2765
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) On or about July 12, 2024, employees conducting roofing work on an existing residential roof with an 8:12 pitch, were not protected from falling to the lower level. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 20 feet over the back of the house and 10 feet over the front of the residential property.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2024
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) On or about July 12, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees exposed to potential fall hazards had been trained to recognize and minimize the fall hazards associated with their work. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 20 feet over the back of the house and 10 feet over the front of the residential property.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a ) On or about July 12, 2024, the employer did not ensure the two Werner portable extension ladders used by employees to access the roof of the residential home extended at least three feet above the upper landing, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 20 foot fall to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2765
More inspections at Anna Maria Barrera
View Anna Maria Barrera's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347613077.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.