WASHINGTON, DC —
OSHA Inspection: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY in 5900 MACARTHUR BLVD NW DALECARLIA CAMPUS, WASHINGTON, DC 20016 (NAICS 221310). OSHA activity number 347672958.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
- Site address
- 5900 MACARTHUR BLVD NW DALECARLIA CAMPUS
- City
- WASHINGTON
- State
- DC
- ZIP
- 20016
- Mailing
- 5900 MACARTHUR BLVD NW DALECARLIA CAMPUS, WASHINGTON, DC 20016
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 221310
- Employees
- 141
- Ownership type
- D
Citations
15 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.36 E02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(e)(2): The door that connects any room to an exit route did not swing out in the direction of exit travel when the room is designed to be occupied by more than 50 people or if the room is a high hazard area: a) Filter Gallery East, South Exit Door- On or about September 18, 2024, employees were performing a filter washing process that generated chlorine gas, and the exit door opened inward. b) Filter Gallery East, West Exit Door - On or about September 18, 2024, employees were performing a filter washing process that generated chlorine gas, and the exit door opened inward. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.36 H04
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(h)(4): The outdoor exit route had a dead-end that is longer than 20 feet (6.2 m). a) Filter Gallery East, South Exit Door - On or about September 18, 2024, the outdoor exit route ended at a locked gate that was approximately 472 feet in travel distance to the locked gate. b) Filter Gallery East, West Exit door - On or about September 18, 2024, the outdoor exit route was obstructed by orange traffic cones and the exit route travel distance was approximately 140 feet or more. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.37 B04
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent: a) Chemical Building Throughout 2nd Floor: On or about August 28, 2024, Operators were exposed to cuts, lacerations, fractures, asphyxiation, 2nd and 3rd degree burns, smoke inhalation, and or death when exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent. b) Chemical Building Throughout Basement - On or about August 28, 2024, Operators were exposed to cuts, lacerations, fractures, asphyxiation, 2nd and 3rd degree burns, smoke inhalation, and or death when exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.37 B05
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use. a) Filter Gallery East, West Wall - On or about September 18, 2024, the one set of doors connecting to other work areas were likely to be mistaken for an exit and were not marked "Not an Exit". b) Filter Gallery East, East Wall - On or about September 18, 2024, the two set of doors connecting to other work areas were likely to be mistaken for an exit and were not marked "Not an Exit". c) Filter Gallery East, South Center - On or about September 18, 2024, set of Center sliding doors leading to the Basin were likely to be mistaken for an exit and were not marked "Not an Exit". In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: a) RPF Building, 3rd Floor Centrifuge Room: On or about August 7, 2024, employees are not wearing eye protection when collecting water samples from sludge that came from Basin 4 and a mist of the material is being released that could get into both eyes causing serious injury. b) Filter Gallery East: On or about August 7, 2024, employees are not wearing eye protection while performing the filter washing process that is releasing elevated levels of chlorine gas that can get in both eyes causing serious injury. c) Basin 4, Confine Space: On or about August 7, 2024, employees are not wearing eye protection while performing cleanup of the sludge that contained Sodium Hypochlorite, NORWECO Bio-Max, Copper Sulfate Solution, triple amount of Aluminum Sulfate and other unknown content that is releasing elevated levels of chlorine gas and hydrogen sulfide gas that can get in both eyes causing serious injury. d) Chemical Building Lime Machine - On or about August 7, 2024, employees were performing work activities are not wearing eye protection while handling corrosives such as NORWECO Bio-Max dry and wet lime that can get in both eyes causing serious injury. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: On or about August 7, 2024, Water Treatment Plant Operators worked with large quantities of corrosives and emergency eyewash and shower stations were missing and or had deficiencies such as but not limited to no weekly inspection, dirty water, not working, missing plumbing, and or had low pressure. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1000 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(b)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of hydrogen sulfide listed in Table Z-2 in excess of the ceiling concentration of 20 ppm: (a) RPF Building 3rd Floor Centrifuge Room - On or about September 18, 2024, The Industrial Specialist helping trouble shoot all processes, train new employees and collecting water samples from the centrifuges was exposed to hydrogen sulfide at 147.4 ppm which is approximately 7.37 times the Ceiling level of 20 ppm and 2.95 ppm times the Peak level of 50 ppm. This exposure occurred over a 322-minute sampling period. (b) RPF Building 3rd Floor Centrifuge Room - On or about September 25, 2024, A Water Treatment Plant Operator performing residual solids processing, monitoring equipment, and monitoring Skater was exposed to hydrogen sulfide at 118.3 ppm which is approximately 5.92 times the ceiling level of 20 ppm and 2.37 times the Peak level of 50 ppm. This exposure occurred over a 90-minute sampling period. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d): (a) RPF 3rd Floor Centrifuge Room - On or about September 18, 2024, Engineering controls were not determined and implemented or maintained to ensue employee exposures were below the permissible exposure limit and short-term exposure limit for hydrogen sulfide. The Industrial Specialist helping trouble shoot all processes, train new employees and collecting water samples from the centrifuges was exposed to hydrogen sulfide at 147.4 ppm which is approximately 7.37 times the Ceiling level of 20 ppm and 2.95 ppm times the Peak level of 50 ppm. (b) RPF 3rd Floor Centrifuge Room - On or about September 25, 2024, the employer did not ensure that a Water Treatment Plant Operator exposed to hydrogen sulfide (H2S) did not exceed the PEL ceiling of 20 ppm Or PEL Peak of 50 ppm (10 minutes once only, if no other measurable exposure). A Water Treatment Plant Operator was performing residual solids processing, monitoring equipment, and monitoring Skater which results in production of solids. Workers are required to go into the equipment room every three hours or as needed in a poorly ventilated area and were exposed to H2S at 118.3 ppm approximately 5.92 times the ceiling level of 20 ppm and 2.37 times the Peak level of 50 ppm. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) Washington Aqueduct Dalecarlia - On or about August 7, 2024, where employees were observed working with chemicals that included but were not limited to chlorine, hydrogen sulfide, caustic soda, phosphoric acid, etc. the employer did not fully implement a written hazard communication program. Thus, exposing the employees to severe hazards associated with handling corrosive chemicals. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet. (a) Washington Aqueduct - On or about August 7, 2024, the employer did not include all hazardous chemicals being used onsite on their list of hazardous chemicals to include but not limited to INDUCLOR Calcium Hypochlorite, NORWECO Bio-Max, GLB Super Charge, Clear guard, signal Danger, and SCI 62. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical: a) Front Inside Hypo Building behind the Caustic Silo, White Cabinet - On August 28, 2024, a partially filled white five-gallon secondary container, on the floor beside a white cabinet, behind the 1st Caustic Silo, was not marked with required information. The unmarked container contained a yellow liquid that appeared to be sodium hypochlorite. b) Hypo Building Front behind Caustic Silo - On or about August 28,2024, five sample containers with unknown length of time, utilized by employees, located on the white sampling table, was not marked with required information. The unmarked containers contained a yellow liquid that appeared to be sodium hypochlorite. c) Hypo Building Sodium Hypochlorite delivery - On or about August 28, 2024, a partially filled white sample container, was not marked with the required information. The unmarked container sitting on top of the standpipe, contained a yellow liquid that appeared to be sodium hypochlorite. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical. a) Washington Aqueduct - On or about August 7, 2024, the employer did not have copies of all safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals being used onsite to include but not limited to INDUCLOR Calcium Hypochlorite, NORWECO Bio-Max, GLB Super Charge, Clear guard, signal Danger, and SCI 62. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200 (h)(3): The employers did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and material safety data sheets: a) RPF Building, Centrifuge Box: On or about August 7, 2024, Water Treatment Plant Operators are not being provided with the required training to equip them with the knowledge to know how to detect the presence of hazardous chemical release in their work area in that What operations have hazardous chemicals present; how employees are to protect themselves from hazardous chemicals.; Location and availability of the written HCS program including the required list(s) of hazardous chemicals and SDSs; How the employer monitors (e.g., monitoring devices, visual, odor) for hazardous chemicals.; The physical and health hazards (including hazards not otherwise classified) of the chemicals in the work area.; Measures employees can take to protect themselves from the; hazardous chemicals including any specific procedures (e.g., work practices, emergency procedures, PPE). Workers were observed not wearing adequate PPE while performing their work duties. b) Filter Gallery East: On or about August 7, 2024, Water Treatment Plant Operators are not being provided with the required training to equip them with the knowledge to know how to detect the presence of hazardous chemical release in their work area in that What operations have hazardous chemicals present; how employees are to protect themselves from hazardous chemicals.; Location and availability of the written HCS program including the required list(s) of hazardous chemicals and SDSs; How the employer monitors (e.g., monitoring devices, visual, odor) for hazardous chemicals.; The physical and health hazards (including hazards not otherwise classified) of the chemicals in the work area.; Measures employees can take to protect themselves from the; hazardous chemicals including any specific procedures (e.g., work practices, emergency procedures, PPE). Workers were observed not wearing adequate PPE while performing their work duties. c) Basin 4, Confine Space: On or about August 7, 2024, FM&R employers are not being provided with the required training to equip them with the knowledge to know how to detect the presence of hazardous chemical release in their work area in that What operations have hazardous chemicals present; how employees are to protect themselves from hazardous chemicals.; Location and availability of the written HCS program including the required list(s) of hazardous chemicals and SDSs; How the employer monitors (e.g., monitoring devices, visual, odor) for hazardous chemicals.; The physical and health hazards (including hazards not otherwise classified) of the chemicals in the work area.; Measures employees can take to protect themselves from the; hazardous chemicals including any specific procedures (e.g., work practices, emergency procedures, PPE). Workers were observed not wearing adequate PPE while performing their work duties. d) Chemical Building Lime Machine - On or about August 7, 2024, Water Treatment Plant Operators are not being provided with the required training to equip them with the knowledge to know how to detect the presence of hazardous chemical release in their work area in that What operations have hazardous chemicals present; how employees are to protect themselves from hazardous chemicals.; Location and availability of the written HCS program including the required list(s) of hazardous chemicals and SDSs; How the employer monitors (e.g., monitoring devices, visual, odor) for hazardous chemicals.; The physical and health hazards (including hazards not otherwise classified) of the chemicals in the work area.; Measures employees can take to protect themselves from the; hazardous chemicals including any specific procedures (e.g., work practices, emergency procedures, PPE). Workers were observed not wearing adequate PPE while performing their work duties. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: On or about August 7, 2024: The employer did not verify that a hazard assessment to evaluate workplace hazards specifically related to wastewater treatment processes where Operators and FM&R employees were exposed to that hazards that included but were not limited to hydrogen Sulfide (H2S), chlorine, drowning, and fall hazards in the following areas while working in the RPF Building, Filter Gallery, Basin 4 and Chemical Building. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) Washington Aqueduct Buildings Dalecarlia Facilities - On or about August 7, 2024, the employer did not develop and implement a site-specific respiratory protection program where Water Treatment Plant Operators and FM&R workers are exposed to respiratory hazards from hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, hydrogen sulfide gas when collecting water samples from a centrifuge box, where employees were exposed levels of hydrogen sulfide that averaged 0.7-150 ppm. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet), in addition, documentation demonstrating the abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include but is not limited to evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
FORT DETRICK, MD—2026-04-17
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
FORT LIBERTY, NC—2024-10-02 00:00:00
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
WASHINGTON, DC—2024-08-07 00:00:00
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
FORT DETRICK, MD—2023-10-11 00:00:00
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
CLEVELAND, GA—2022-08-10 00:00:00
U.S DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
View U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 221310)
WAUSEON, OH—2026-07-16
WATSON WELL DRILLING INC.
GLASSBORO, NJ—2026-07-15
GLASSBORO WATER & SEWER DEPARTMENT
ROYAL OAK, MI—2026-07-15
SOUTHEASTERN OAKLAND COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
CARTHAGE, TN—2026-07-10
SMITH UTILITY DISTRICT WATER TREATMENT PLANT
PATERSON, WA—2026-07-10
WA317992032 - COLUMBIA WATER & POWER DISTRICT
More inspections in DC
WASHINGTON, DC—2026-06-30
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
WASHINGTON, DC—2026-06-16
MACY'S
WASHINGTON, DC—2026-06-02
RIGO MULTISERVICES
WASHINGTON, DC—2026-06-02
DDC CPL LLC
WASHINGTON, DC—2026-06-02
DDC CPL LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347672958.