Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CARLOS KETZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CARLOS KETZ in 912 MESSER STREET, RHINELANDER, WI 54501 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347699746.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Carlos Ketz — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Carlos Ketz is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CARLOS KETZ
Site address
912 MESSER STREET
City
RHINELANDER
State
WI
ZIP
54501
Mailing
260 KAUKAUNA STREET, MENASHA, WI 54952
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2025
Abate by
Feb 18, 2025
Penalty
Initial $584 · Current $584
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1):The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  The employer failed to provide abatement certification related to the standards that were cited and issued November 8, 2024.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $584

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2025
Abate by
Feb 18, 2025
Penalty
Initial $584 · Current $584
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1):The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  The employer failed to provide abatement documentation for the citations issued November 8, 2024, related to the use of fall protection and having ladders installed three feet above the point of access.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $584

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2024
Abate by
Dec 10, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,056 · Current $4,056
29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.  On or about August 20, 2024, at an establishment located at 912 Messer Street in Rhinelander, Wisconsin, two employees of A.G.X. Consruction LLC were exposed to struck by hazards from falling tools and construction debris while employees above them were removing old shingles and throwing material from the roof, and the employees on the ground were not wearing hard hats.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4056

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2024
Abate by
Dec 10, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,056 · Current $4,056
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  Carlos Ketz, dba A.G.X. Construction, LLC does not require the use of safety glasses while operating pneumatic nail guns during re-roofing operations; This violation was most recently observed on August 20, 2024, at an establishment located at 912 Messer Street in Rhinelander, Wisconsin, where employees of A.G.X. Consruction LLC were performing residential roofing activities utilizing a nail gun to install asphalt shingles with no form of eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4056

1926.502 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2024
Abate by
Dec 10, 2024
Penalty
Initial $5,071 · Current $5,071
29 CFR  1926.502(d):"Personal fall arrest systems." Personal fall arrest systems and their use shall comply with the provisions set forth below. Effective January 1, 1998, body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. Note: The use of a body belt in a positioning device system is acceptable and is regulated under paragraph (e) of this section.  On or about August 20, 2024, at an establishment located at 912 Messer Street in Rhinelander, Wisconsin, an employee of A.G.X. Consruction LLC was using a body belt as part of a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5071

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2024
Abate by
Dec 10, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,042 · Current $3,042
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  On or about August 20, 2024, at an establishment located at 912 Messer Street in Rhinelander, Wisconsin, employees of A.G.X. Consruction LLC were exposed to fall hazards and were not trained in the requirements of the standard while exposed to fall hazards of over 9 feet 7 inches.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3042

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2024
Abate by
Dec 10, 2024
Penalty
Initial $30,422 · Current $30,422
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Carlos Ketz, dba A.G.X. Construction, LLC does not  require the use of conventional fall protection;  This violation was most recently observed on August 20, 2024, at an establishment located at 912 Messer Street in Rhinelander, Wisconsin, where employees of A.G.X. Consruction LLC were performing residential roofing activities with no form of conventional fall protection while exposed to fall hazards of over 9 feet 7 inches.  A.G.X. Construction LLC was previously cited for a serious violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, (29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)). which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1603980, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on November 15, 2022, with respect to a workplace located at N1445 Westgreen Drive, Greenville, WI 54942.  A.G.X. Construction LLC was previously cited for a serious violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard (29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1548858, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on September 29, 2021, with respect to a workplace located at 1625 North Alexander Street, Appleton, WI 54911.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $30422

1926.1053 B01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2024
Abate by
Dec 10, 2024
Penalty
Initial $20,280 · Current $20,280
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.  Carlos Ketz, dba A.G.X. Construction, LLC does not  require the use of ladders that are installed with the side rails extended at least three feet above the upper landing surface; This violation was most recently observed on August 20, 2024, where the employer had four employees working at 912 Messer Street, Rhinelander, Wisconsin, performing re-roofing activities and accessing and egressing the roof surface with a ladder that did not extend three feet above the roof surface, while exposed to an approximate 9-foot, 2-inch fall.  A.G.X. Construction LLC was previously cited for a serious violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard (29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1603980, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on November 15, 2022, with respect to a workplace located at N1445 Westgreen Drive, Greenville, WI 54942.  A.G.X. Construction LLC was previously cited for a serious violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard (29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1)), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1548858, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on September 29, 2021, with respect to a workplace located at 1625 North Alexander Street, Appleton, WI 54911.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $20280

View Carlos Ketz's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347699746.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.