CARTERSVILLE, GA —
OSHA Inspection: ATL GRANITE INSTALLERS & FABRICATORS LLC
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ATL GRANITE INSTALLERS & FABRICATORS LLC in 130 BEASLEY ROAD SW, CARTERSVILLE, GA 30120 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 347723892.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ATL GRANITE INSTALLERS & FABRICATORS LLC
- Site address
- 130 BEASLEY ROAD SW
- City
- CARTERSVILLE
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30120
- Mailing
- 130 BEASLEY ROAD SW, CARTERSVILLE, GA 30120
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327991
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2025
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,256 · Current $2,800 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c):The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: a) Production: On or about August 15, 2024, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that a written respiratory protection program was not developed and implemented for employees that were tasked with stone cutting and grinding.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $4256
1910.1053 C
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2025
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,256 · Current $2,800 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(c): The employer did not ensure that no employee was exposed to an airborne concentration of respirable crystalline silica in excess of 50 g/m3, calculated as an 8-hour TWA: a) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that a polisher tasked with polishing stone countertops was exposed to Respirable Crystalline Silica at an 8-hour TWA of 110 µg/m3. This level exceeded the Permissible Exposure Limit for RCS (50 µg/m3). The exposure was derived from a sample collected for a 452-minute sampling period. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the time not sampled. b) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that a polisher tasked with polishing stone countertops was exposed to Respirable Crystalline Silica at an 8-hour TWA of 110 µg/m3. This level exceeded the Permissible Exposure Limit for RCS (50 µg/m3). The exposure was derived from a sample collected for a 443-minute sampling period. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the time not sampled. c) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that a polisher tasked with polishing stone countertops was exposed to Respirable Crystalline Silica at an 8-hour TWA of 62 µg/m3. This level exceeded the Permissible Exposure Limit for RCS (50 µg/m3). The exposure was derived from a sample collected for a 443-minute sampling period. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the time not sampled. d) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that a polisher tasked with polishing stone countertops was exposed to Respirable Crystalline Silica at an 8-hour TWA of 240 µg/m3. This level exceeded the Permissible Exposure Limit for RCS (50 µg/m3). The exposure was derived from a sample collected for a 431-minute sampling period. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the time not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $4256
1910.1053 F01
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2025
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(1):The employer did not use engineering and work practice controls to reduce and maintain employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica to or below the PEL, unless the employer can demonstrate that such controls are not feasible: a) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that a polisher tasked with polishing stone countertops, using wet cutting methods, was exposed to Respirable Crystalline Silica at an 8-hour TWA of 110 µg/m3. This level exceeded the Permissible Exposure Limit for RCS (50 µg/m3). The exposure was derived from a sample collected for a 452-minute sampling period. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the time not sampled. b) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that a polisher tasked with polishing stone countertops, using wet cutting methods, was exposed to Respirable Crystalline Silica at an 8-hour TWA of 110 µg/m3. This level exceeded the Permissible Exposure Limit for RCS (50 µg/m3). The exposure was derived from a sample collected for a 443-minute sampling period. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the time not sampled. c) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that a polisher tasked with polishing stone countertops, using wet cutting methods, was exposed to Respirable Crystalline Silica at an 8-hour TWA of 62 µg/m3. This level exceeded the Permissible Exposure Limit for RCS (50 µg/m3). The exposure was derived from a sample collected for a 443-minute sampling period. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the time not sampled. d) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that a polisher tasked with polishing stone countertops, using wet cutting methods, was exposed to Respirable Crystalline Silica at an 8-hour TWA of 240 µg/m3. This level exceeded the Permissible Exposure Limit for RCS (50 µg/m3). The exposure was derived from a sample collected for a 431-minute sampling period. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the time not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 D01
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2025
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,256 · Current $2,800 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(d)(1):The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(3) of this section: a) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that the employer did not asses 8- hour TWA exposures to Respirable Crystalline Silica for a polisher tasked with polishing stone countertops. The polisher was exposed to Respirable Crystalline Silica at an 8-hour TWA of 110 µg/m3. This level exceeded the Permissible Exposure Limit for RCS (50 µg/m3). b) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that the employer did not asses 8- hour TWA exposures to Respirable Crystalline Silica for a polisher tasked with polishing stone countertops. The polisher was exposed to Respirable Crystalline Silica at an 8-hour TWA of 110 µg/m3. This level exceeded the Permissible Exposure Limit for RCS (50 µg/m3). c) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that the employer did not asses 8- hour TWA exposures to Respirable Crystalline Silica for a polisher tasked with polishing stone countertops. The polisher was exposed to Respirable Crystalline Silica at an 8-hour TWA of 62 µg/m3. This level exceeded the Permissible Exposure Limit for RCS (50 µg/m3). d) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that the employer did not asses 8- hour TWA exposures to Respirable Crystalline Silica for a fabricator tasked with cutting stone countertops. The fabricator was exposed to Respirable Crystalline Silica at an 8-hour TWA of 240 µg/m3. This level exceeded the Permissible Exposure Limit for RCS (50 µg/m3).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $4256
1910.1053 F02 I
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2025
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,256 · Current $2,800 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(2)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan: a) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that an exposure control plan that included a description of the tasks in the workplace that involved exposure to silica, a description of the engineering controls, work practices, respiratory protection and housekeeping rules, was not developed and implemented while polishers, fabricators and CNC machine operators were tasked with cutting and polishing stone countertops.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $4256
1910.1053 J03 I
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2025
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,256 · Current $2,800 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(j)(3)(i): The employer did ensure that each employee covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the health hazards associated with exposure to respirable crystalline silica; specific tasks in the workplace that could result in exposure to respirable crystalline silica; specific measures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to respirable crystalline silica; the contents of this section; and the purpose and a description of the medical surveillance program required by paragraph (i) of this section: a) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that training related to the exposure, tasks, control measures, training contents and purpose of medical evaluations was not given to polishers, fabricators and CNC machine operators when tasked with cutting and polishing stone countertops.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $4256
1910.1053 E01
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2025
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $398 · Current $204 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(e)(1): The employer did not establish a regulated area wherever an employee's exposure to airborne concentrations of respirable crystalline silica was, or could have been reasonably expected to be, in excess of the PEL: a) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that the employer failed to establish a demarcated and regulated work area, that had concentrations of respirable crystalline silica above the PEL.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $204
- — Z (O) $398
1910.1053 J02
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2025
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(j)(2): The employer did not post signs at all entrances to regulated areas that bear the following legend: DANGER RESPIRABLE CRYSTALLINE SILICA MAY CAUSE CANCER CAUSES DAMAGE TO LUNGS WEAR RESPIRATORY PROTECTION IN THIS AREA AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY a) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that signage indicating presence of Respirable Crystalline Silica out front of the areas was not posted while levels of RCS were above the PEL.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1053 I02
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2025
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $398 · Current $398
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(i)(2): The employer did not make available an initial (baseline) medical examination within 30 days after initial assignment when the employee had not received a medical examination that meets the requirements of this section within the last three years: a) Production: On or about October 25, 2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that a medical evaluation prior to initiating the work at the establishment, was not provided to polishers, fabricators and CNC machine operators when tasked with cutting and polishing stone countertops.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $398
- — Z (O) $398
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2025
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $398 · Current $398
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) Production: On or about October 25, 2024, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards, in that a written hazard communication program was not implemented, when employees were tasked with handling hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to Respirable Crystalline Silica and KBond VIVID Knife Grade Vinyl Resin.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $398
- — Z (O) $398
More inspections at ATL Granite Installers & Fabricators LLC
View ATL Granite Installers & Fabricators LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327991)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347723892.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.