Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOHN LANZAFAME

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOHN LANZAFAME in 2 BATES ST, METHUEN, MA 01844 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347748717.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch John Lanzafame — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for John Lanzafame is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOHN LANZAFAME
Site address
2 BATES ST
City
METHUEN
State
MA
ZIP
01844
Mailing
30 TEMPLE DRIVE, METHUEN, MA 01844
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,457 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying objects while using a nail gun.  Location: Job site;  On or about 09/11/2024, an employee was allowed to utilize a Metabo HPT pneumatic nail gun without proper eye/face protection to protect against potential flying objects.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  Location: Job site;  On or about 09/11/2024, the employer allowed an employee to engage in roofing activities without the use of fall protection on a residential roof that was 12-feet above the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.1053 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend to at least 3 feet (.9m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access nor was the ladder secured at it's top to a ridged support and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, provided to assist the employee in mounting and dismounting the the ladder.   Location: Job site;  On or about 09/11/2024, an employee was allowed to utilize a portable Werner extension ladder which did not extend 3-feet above the upper landing surface of the roof which it was being used to gain access to.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View John Lanzafame's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347748717.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.