STAFFORD, TX —
OSHA Inspection: D&R SIGNS, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of D&R SIGNS, LLC in 12999 MURPHY ROAD, STAFFORD, TX 77477 (NAICS 339950). OSHA activity number 347759110.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- D&R SIGNS, LLC
- Site address
- 12999 MURPHY ROAD
- City
- STAFFORD
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77477
- Mailing
- ATTN: CORY KAMEGO 4801 W UNIVERSITY DR #102, DENTON, TX 76207
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 339950
- Employees
- 44
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $8,816 · Current $4,408 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) On or about September 17, 2024, at the powder coating area, a written respiratory protection program was not established and implemented for employees required to use 3M half-face respirators during powder coating activities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4408
- — Z (S) $8816
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) On or about September 17, 2024, at the powder coating area, employees using 3M half-face respirators during powder coating activities had not received medical evaluations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) On or about September 17, 2024, at the powder coating area, employees using 3M half-face respirators during powder coating activities had not been fit tested.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: a) On or about September 17, 2024, at the powder coating area, where the employer permitted employees to wear facial hair while being required to use 3M half-face respirators during powder coating activities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve: a) On or about September 17, 2024, at the powder coating area, respirators were stored inside the powder coating area when not used and thus were subject to contamination from dust and hazardous substances including polyester/TGIC.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training to employees who were required to use respirators: a) On or about September 17, 2024, at the powder coating area, the employer did not provide respiratory protection training for employees required to use 3M half-face respirators during powder coating activities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $7,052 · Current $3,526 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a) On or about September 17, 2024, at the powder coating area, an adequate eye wash station was not provided where employees were spraying polyester/TGIC.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3526
- — Z (S) $7052
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $7,052 · Current $3,526 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) On or about September 17, 2024, at the powder coating area, employees had not received hazard communication information and training. Employees use hazardous chemical such as, polyester/TGIC, a corrosive.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3526
- — Z (S) $7052
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification: a) On or about September 17, 2024, at the production floor, the employer did not certify that the workplace hazard assessment for personal protective equipment had been performed for welding and powder coating activities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at D&R Signs, LLC
View D&R Signs, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 339950)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347759110.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.