Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SOUTHERN METALS COMPANY OF MISSISSIPPI, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of SOUTHERN METALS COMPANY OF MISSISSIPPI, INC. in 144 DON CURT ROAD, LAUREL, MS 39440 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 347795338.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Southern Metals Company of Mississippi, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Southern Metals Company of Mississippi, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
144 DON CURT ROAD
City
LAUREL
State
MS
ZIP
39440
Mailing
144 DON CURT ROAD, LAUREL, MS 39440
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2024
Abate by
Feb 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $5,531 · Current $5,531
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): A continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) was not instituted when employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 dBA:   (a) Press Area - On or about November 20, 2024, a Transport Tech was exposed to continuous noise at a dose of 110% or an equivalent time-weighted average of 89.9 dBA, which is in excess of the 85 dBA Action level, during a 360-minute sampling period on 11-20-2024.  Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the time not sampled.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5531

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2024
Abate by
Jan 24, 2025
Penalty
Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) Facility - On or about October 03, 2024, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear 3M half face series respirator, exposing employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2765

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2024
Abate by
Feb 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   a) Facility - On or about October 03, 2024, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation for employees using a 3M half face series respirator exposing the employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2024
Abate by
Feb 14, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece was used, and at least annually thereafter:     a) Facility - On or about October 03, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees were fit tested before using a 3M half face respirator series respirator, exposing employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2024
Abate by
Jan 24, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable, and effective annual training to employees who were required to use respirators.    Facility - On or about October 03, 2024, the employer did not provide respiratory training to the employee(s) required to use a 3m half face respirator exposing employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2024
Abate by
Jan 24, 2025
Penalty
Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement and maintain at the workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g) and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met:  (a)  Facility - On or about May October 03, 2024, the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program governing the usage of chemicals in the facility, such as but not limited to Xylene, Thinner, Propane, and etc., exposing employees to hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2765

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace:   (a) Facility - On or October 03, 2024, the employer did not have Safety Data Sheets for chemicals that are used in the shop such as but not limited to Lacquer Thinner, AKEMI Stain Repellent, Diesel, and etc., exposing employees to hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2024
Abate by
Jan 24, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  (a) Facility- On or about October 03, 2024, the employer did not certify that a hazard assessment for the required personal protective equipment had been performed, exposing employees to eye, face, hand, and slip hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Southern Metals Company of Mississippi, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347795338.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.