OAK CREEK, WI —
OSHA Inspection: K&L ROOFING LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of K&L ROOFING LLC in 2401 FARMINGTON LANE, OAK CREEK, WI 53154 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347807109.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- K&L ROOFING LLC
- Site address
- 2401 FARMINGTON LANE
- City
- OAK CREEK
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53154
- Mailing
- 4477 SAFFORD ROAD, ROCKFORD, IL 61101
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2024
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s). (a) On or about October 9, 2024, the employer did not ensure frequent and regular inspections of the job site were conducted by a competent person to ensure hazardous conditions were identified and corrected.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3457
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. (a) On or about October 9, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees using pneumatic nail guns were wearing eye protection equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3457
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) On or about October 9, 2024, employees conducting roofing work on a new residential property with a 6:12 pitch roof, were not protected from falling to the lower level. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet over the garage and 20 feet over the backside of the residential property.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.503 C03
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2024
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): 29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): When inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill, the employer shall retrain the affected employee. (a) On or about October 9, 2024, the employer did not ensure employees exposed to potential fall hazards had been properly trained to recognize and minimize the fall hazards associated with their work. This is to include proper installation of anchor points and the proper selection of fall protection equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3457
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,074 · Current $1,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a ) On or about October 9, 2024, the employer did not ensure the two Hart Multi-positioning ladders used by employees to access the roof of the residential home extended at least three feet above the upper landing, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1300
- — Z (S) $2074
More inspections at K&L Roofing LLC
View K&L Roofing LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347807109.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.