MUKWONAGO, WI —
OSHA Inspection: ADELHELM LUBRICOAT NA LLC
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ADELHELM LUBRICOAT NA LLC in 621 BAXTER DRIVE, MUKWONAGO, WI 53149 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 347808818.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ADELHELM LUBRICOAT NA LLC
- Site address
- 621 BAXTER DRIVE
- City
- MUKWONAGO
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53149
- Mailing
- 621 BAXTER DRIVE, MUKWONAGO, WI 53149
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332812
- Employees
- 17
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.107 B09
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,412 · Current $1,206 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible construction: (a) On or about October 10, 2024, all sides of the paint booth did not maintain at least a 3 foot clearance as there was a flammable storage cabinet, a paint cleaning station, and work desk positioned directly on the left side of the booth. (b) On or about October 10, 2024, all sides of the powder coating booth did not maintain at least a 3 foot clearance as there was a storage rack positioned directly on the ride side of the booth.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1206
- — Z (S) $2412
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,020 · Current $2,010 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1):The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: On or about October 29, 2024, an employee performed abrasive blasting activities while being exposed to noise levels that equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (dBA), or an equivalent dose of fifty percent, without a continuing and effective hearing conservation program in place. The employer failed to implement the hearing conservation program to include monitoring to identify employees for inclusion into the program, audiometric testing to provide surveillance for noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL), and hearing conservation training. (a) On October 29, 2024, an abrasive blasting employee was exposed to noise at 102% of the permissible daily dose, or an average sound level of 90.2 dBA, as measured over 396 minutes of sampling. This dose is equivalent to an 8-hour TWA exposure of 90.2 dBA.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2010
- — Z (S) $4020
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1):The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: On or about October 29, 2024, an employee performed abrasive blasting activities while being exposed to noise levels that equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (dBA), or an equivalent dose of fifty percent, without a continuing and effective hearing conservation program in place. The employer failed to implement the hearing conservation program to include monitoring to identify employees for inclusion into the program, audiometric testing to provide surveillance for noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL), and hearing conservation training. (a) On or about October 29, 2024, the employer did not provide audiometric testing for the abrasive blasting employee who was exposed to noise at 102% of the permissible daily dose, or an average sound level of 90.2 dBA, as measured over 396 minutes of sampling. This dose is equivalent to an 8-hour TWA exposure of 90.2 dBA.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1):The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k). The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program: On or about October 29, 2024, an employee performed abrasive blasting activities while being exposed to noise levels that equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (dBA), or an equivalent dose of fifty percent, without a continuing and effective hearing conservation program in place. The employer failed to implement the hearing conservation program to include monitoring to identify employees for inclusion into the program, audiometric testing to provide surveillance for noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL), and hearing conservation training. (a) On or about October 29, 2024, the employer did not provide training to the abrasive blasting employee who was exposed to noise at 102% of the permissible daily dose, or an average sound level of 90.2 dBA, as measured over 396 minutes of sampling. This dose is equivalent to an 8-hour TWA exposure of 90.2 dBA.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,020 · Current $2,010 Reduced
9135Q115
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: (a) On or about October 10, 2024, employees engaged in painting and abrasive blasting operations are utilizing respiratory protection under required use without a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2010
- — Z (S) $4020
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9135Q115
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) On or about October 10, 2024, employees utilized elastomeric respiratory protection (3M Half Mask 6000 series) for painting operations and supplied air hoods (Nova3) for abrasive blasting operations, did not receive a medical evaluation prior to use of respiratory protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9135Q115
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (a) On or about October 10, 2024, an employee utilized elastomeric respiratory protection (3M Half Mask 6000 Series) during painting operations without receiving a fit test.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9135Q115
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1):The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii): (a) On or about October 10, 2024, employees who utilized respiratory protection under required use for painting and abrasive blasting operations, did not receive training on the requirements of respirator use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9135Q115
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program that included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): (a) On or about October 10, 2024, the employer did not implement a written hazard communication program for employees working with paints and abrasive blast media, which contains hazards elements.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Adelhelm Lubricoat NA LLC
View Adelhelm Lubricoat NA LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332812)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347808818.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.