NASHUA, NH —
OSHA Inspection: BECK & BELLUCCI, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of BECK & BELLUCCI, INC. in BRIDGE STREET, WESTBOUND BRIDGE, NASHUA, NH 03060 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 347833477.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BECK & BELLUCCI, INC.
- Site address
- BRIDGE STREET, WESTBOUND BRIDGE
- City
- NASHUA
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03060
- Mailing
- PO BOX 429, FRANKLIN, NH 03235
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237310
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $8,067 · Current $4,033 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103) Location: Bridge Street Bridge, Nashua/Hudson, NH On or about October 22, 2024, employees required to wear North half face respirators were not medically evaluated by the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4033
- — Z (S) $8067
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator and annually thereafter: (Construction Reference 1926.103) a) Location: Bridge Street Bridge, Nashua/Hudson, NH On or about October 22, 2024, employees required to wear North half face respirators were not fit tested by the employer prior to wearing a respirator during exposure to respirable crystalline silica. b) Location: Bridge Street Bridge, Nashua/Hudson, NH On or about October 22, 2024, an employee required to wear a North half face respirator during exposure to respirable crystalline silica had not been fit tested within the prior year.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: (Construction Reference 1926.103) Location: Bridge Street Bridge, Nashua/Hudson, NH On or about October 22, 2024, an employee was exposed to respiratory hazards from respirable crystalline silica when they wore a North half face respirator and had a beard that came between the sealing surface of the respirator and the face.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve: (Construction Reference 1926.103) Location: Bridge Street Bridge, Nashua/Hudson, NH On or about October 22, 2024, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards from respirable crystalline silica when a respirator was found stored unprotected in a wheelbarrow and was coated in concrete dust.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B04 II
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $6,453 · Current $6,453
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(ii): Each employee on a walking/working surface was not protected from tripping in or stepping into or through holes by covers. a) Location: Bridge Street Bridge, Nashua/Hudson, NH On or about October 22, 2024, employees were not protected from stepping into holes approximately 3 inches deep and varying widths and lengths which were left uncovered after chipping out the concrete. b) Location: Bridge Street Bridge, Nashua/Hudson, NH On or about October 22, 2024, employees were not protected from stepping into/through an approximately 4 foot wide by 10 foot long opening made when the expansion joint was removed, and the opening not covered.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6453
- — Z (S) $6453
1926.1153 D02 I
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $0 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section: Location: Bridge Street Bridge, Nashua/Hudson, NH On or about October 22, 2024, employees were exposed to respirable crystalline silica during chipping of concrete bridge decking. The employer did not assess the employee exposure where the most recent exposure monitoring conducted on July 28, 2017, did not indicate the 8-hour time weighted average exposure and did not identify the work tasks monitored.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $11292
1926.1153 G01 II
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2024
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1)(ii): The exposure control plan did not contain a description of the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica for each task: Location: Bridge Street Bridge, Nashua/Hudson, NH On or about October 22, 2024, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards from respirable crystalline silica where the written exposure control plan did not outline for each task a description of engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection used to limit employee exposure.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1153 G02
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2024
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(2): The employer did not review and evaluate the effectiveness of the written exposure control plan at least annually and update it as necessary: Location: Bridge Street Bridge, Nashua/Hudson, NH On or about October 22, 2024, employees were exposed to respirable crystalline silica during chipping of concrete bridge decking. The employer's exposure control plan had not been revised in approximately 21 months.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Beck & Bellucci, INC.
View Beck & Bellucci, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237310)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347833477.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.