OSHA Inspection: CARLOS AMARO

Issued

Mar 6, 2025

Penalty

Initial $2,837 · Current $2,200 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a. On or about November 27, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee working on the ground, under a worker performing residential roofing operations, was not wearing a hard hat to protect against falling materials and debris.

Issued

Mar 6, 2025

Penalty

Initial $3,547 · Current $1,640 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a. On or about November 27, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee using pneumatic nail guns was not wearing safety glasses, thereby exposing the employee to hazards associated with eye injuries.

Issued

Mar 6, 2025

Penalty

Initial $4,965 · Current $2,250 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a. On or about November 27, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, eighteen (18) feet ten (10) inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.  b. On or about November 27, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, nine (9) feet nine (9) inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.

Issued

Mar 6, 2025

Penalty

Initial $2,837 · Current $1,000 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.  a. On or about November 27, 2024, the portable ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least three (3') feet above the upper landing surface nor was it secured at the top, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls.

Issued

Mar 6, 2025

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:(a)  a) On November 27, 2024, an employee was exposed to fall hazards while using an A-frame ladder on a roof to access and egress the roof above.

Issued

Mar 6, 2025

Abate by

May 1, 2025

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  a. On or about November 27, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees had been provided fall protection training, however, the employer failed to keep a written certification record of the training.