Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SARTORI COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SARTORI COMPANY in 12 WEST MAIN STREET, PLYMOUTH, WI 53073 (NAICS 311513). OSHA activity number 347959579.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sartori Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sartori Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SARTORI COMPANY
Site address
12 WEST MAIN STREET
City
PLYMOUTH
State
WI
ZIP
53073
Mailing
107 N. PLEASANT VIEW ROAD, PLYMOUTH, WI 53073
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311513
Employees
100
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2025
Abate by
Mar 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $13,005 · Current $7,153 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.133(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  On or about January 21, 2025, at an establishment located at 12 West Main Street, Plymouth, WI, the employer did not ensure that employees used appropriate eyewear such as chemical goggles or face shields while conducting sanitation activities that required the use of caustic chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7152.75
  • — Z (S) $13005

1910.146 C04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2025
Abate by
Mar 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $13,005 · Current $7,153 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.146(c)(4): If the employer decides that its employees will enter permit spaces, the employer shall develop and implement a written permit space program that complies with this section. The written program shall be available for inspection by employees and their authorized representatives.  On or about September 7, 2024, at an establishment located at 12 West Main Street, Plymouth, WI, the employer did not ensure that a written permit space was implemented prior to allowing employees to enter Cheese Vat 001 to conduct cleaning and maintenance tasks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7152.75
  • — Z (S) $13005

1910.146 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2025
Abate by
Mar 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.146(e)(1): Before entry is authorized, the employer shall document the completion of measures required by paragraph (d)(3) of this section by preparing an entry permit.  NOTE: Appendix D to section 1910.146 presents examples of permits whose elements are considered to comply with the requirements of this section.  On or about September 7, 2024, at an establishment located at 12 West Main Street, Plymouth, WI, the employer did not ensure that initial monitoring for potentially hazardous atmospheres inside of Cheese Vat 001 had been completed and documented on the entry permit before entry was accomplished.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 F05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2025
Abate by
Mar 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.146(f)(5): The entry permit that documents compliance with this section and authorizes entry to a permit space shall identify the personnel, by name, currently serving as attendants.  On or about September 7, 2024, at an establishment located at 12 West Main Street, Plymouth, WI, the Entry Permit for Cheese Vat 001 did not include the names of all personnel serving as attendants during an entry for cleaning and maintenance task.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 G03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2025
Abate by
Mar 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.146(g)(3): The training shall establish employee proficiency in the duties required by this section and shall introduce new or revised procedures, as necessary, for compliance with this section.  On or about September 7, 2024, at an establishment located at 12 West Main Street, Plymouth, WI, the employer did not ensure that employees involved in a Permit Required Confined Space Entry were proficient in their duties prior to allowing them to conduct an entry into Cheese Vat 001.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2025
Abate by
Mar 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.146(j)(2): The employer shall ensure that each entry supervisor verifies, by checking that the appropriate entries have been made on the permit, that all tests specified by the permit have been conducted and that all procedures and equipment specified by the permit are in place before endorsing the permit and allowing entry to begin.  On or about September 7, 2024, at an establishment located at 12 West Main Street, Plymouth, WI, the employer did not ensure that an entry Supervisor had verified that all procedures, for the safe entry of Cheese Vat 001, had been completed prior to allowing the entry into the confined space.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 K01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2025
Abate by
Dec 31, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.146(k)(1)(i): An employer who designates rescue and emergency services, pursuant to paragraph (d)(9) of this section, shall evaluate a prospective rescuer's ability to respond to a rescue summons in a timely manner, considering the hazard(s) identified.  Note to paragraph (k)(l)(i): What will be considered timely will vary according to the specific hazards involved in each entry. For example, 1910.134, Respiratory Protection, requires that employers provide a standby person or persons capable of immediate action to rescue employee(s) wearing respiratory protection while in work areas defined as IDLH atmospheres.  On or about September 7, 2024, at an establishment located at 12 West Main Street, Plymouth, WI, the employer did not evaluate the ability of the local Fire Department to perform Confined Space rescue in a timely manner when employees were exposed to potential struck-by and asphyxiation hazards during an entry into Cheese Vat 001.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2025
Abate by
Mar 10, 2025
Penalty
Initial $13,005 · Current $7,153 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1):Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.  a) On or about January 3, 2025, at an establishment located at 12 West Main Street, Plymouth, WI, in the Cheese Table Area, employees conducting cheese making tasks with the End Unloader were exposed to struck-by and entanglement hazards created by the auger of the End Unloader when a 4 inch gap existed between the top of the End Unloader and the flipped up end of the table. The machine was not guarded to prevent exposure to these hazards.   b) On or about January 3, 2025, at an establishment located at 12 West Main Street, Plymouth, WI, in the Cheese Table Area, employees conducting cheese making tasks with the End Unloader were exposed to struck-by and entanglement hazards created by the auger of the End Unloader when the interlock used to deactivate the Unloader was not functional and allowed the Unloader to be moved while still active.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7152.75
  • — Z (S) $13005

View Sartori Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347959579.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.