Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: ORTEGA GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ORTEGA GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP in SADDLE ROCK WAY, MANCHESTER, NH 03102 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347963456.

Watch Ortega General Construction Corp — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ortega General Construction Corp is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
SADDLE ROCK WAY
City
MANCHESTER
State
NH
ZIP
03102
Mailing
179 HILDRETH STREET, LOWELL, MA 01850
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  Site- The employer did not develop a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment, and work site rules was not developed and/or implemented at this jobsite where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  Site- The employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to ensure that it was free from recognizable hazards where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:   Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while working from the roof were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, enabling each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.   Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while using extension ladders to access work areas were not provided with ladder training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   Site- Employees working from the ground were not protected from overhead struck by hazards where head protection was not required to be worn by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure employees used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   Site- An employee operating a pneumatic nail gun was not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not required to be worn by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4839.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Site- Employees working from the high and low roofs were not protected from falls between approximately 10 and 20 feet where fall protection was not utilized by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Site- Employees using aluminum extension ladders to access the high and low roofs were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladders did not extend three feet above the landing surfaces.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.1053 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(9): The area around the top and/or bottom of (a) ladder(s) was not kept clear:  Site- Employees using an aluminum extension ladder to access the high were not protected from a trip hazard where a bundle of shingles were placed on the bottom rung of the ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B22

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(22): Employees  using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall:   Site- An employee using an aluminum extension ladder to access the high roof was not protected from a fall hazard where they were carrying a large box while ascending the ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347963456.