NASHUA, NH ·
OSHA Inspection: ORTEGA GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ORTEGA GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP in 147 TINKER RD, NASHUA, NH 03060 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348982109.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ORTEGA GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP
- Site address
- 147 TINKER RD
- City
- NASHUA
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03060
- Mailing
- 179 HILDRETH STREET, LOWELL, MA 01850
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.502 D09
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $4,256 · Current $2,979 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(9): Lanyards and/or vertical lifelines did not have a minimum breaking strength of 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN): Site- On or about June 5, 2026 an employee working from the roof and using personal fall arrest equipment was not protected from a fall hazard where the vertical lifeline used in the personal fall arrest system was connected to an anchor point with a knot and not a snap hook, reducing the breaking strength of the lifeline to less than 5,000 pounds.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2979.2
- · Z (S) $4256
1926.502 D15 II
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15)(ii): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached, and not installed under the supervision of a qualified person. Site- On or about June 5, 2026 employees using personal fall arrest equipment while working from the roof were not protected from fall hazards where anchor points for personal fall arrest systems were not installed under the supervision of a qualified person. Multiple anchor points were attached to the roof with two life lines attached to the same anchor point for use by multiple employees, anchor points were installed without filling the appropriate amount of holes with fasteners, and the anchor points were turned 90 degrees from the intended orientation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.502 D16 II
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(ii): Personal Fall Arrest Systems, when stopping a fall, did not limit maximum arresting force on an employee to 1,800 pounds (8 kN) when used with a body harness: Site- On or about June 5, 2026 employees working from the roof and using personal fall arrest equipment were not protected from fall related injuries where personal fall arrest systems did not include deceleration devices that would reduce arresting forces on the body to less than 1,800 pounds.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.502 D21
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service: Site- On or about June 5, 2026 employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where personal fall arrest systems in use were not inspected for damage and defective components. Previously in the day and employee working from the high roof and using a personal fall arrest system fell approximately 21 feet and struck the ground.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.502 D16 III
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $5,958 · Current $4,171 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level: Site- On or about June 5, 2026 an employee working from the roof fell approximately 21 feet and struck the ground while using a personal fall arrest system that allowed the employee to free fall more than 6 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4170.6
- · Z (S) $5958
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Jul 13, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $8,513 · Current $5,959 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: Site- The employer did not develop a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment, and work site rules was not developed and/or implemented at this jobsite where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards. Ortega General construction Corp was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 17996345, citation number 1, item number 1a, and was affirmed as a final order on January 21. 2025, with respect to a workplace located at Saddle Rock Way, Manchester, NH 03102.
Recent events (2)
- · I (R) $5959.1
- · Z (R) $8513
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): Site- The employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to ensure that it was free from recognizable hazards where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards. Ortega General construction Corp was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 17996345, citation number 1, item number 1b, and was affirmed as a final order on January 21. 2025, with respect to a workplace located at Saddle Rock Way, Manchester, NH 03102.
Recent events (2)
- · I (R) $0
- · Z (R) $0
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $8,513 · Current $5,959 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Site- Employees working from the ground were not protected from overhead struck by hazards where head protection was not required to be worn by the employer. Ortega General construction Corp was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 17996345, citation number 1, item number 2a, and was affirmed as a final order on January 21. 2025, with respect to a workplace located at Saddle Rock Way, Manchester, NH 03102.
Recent events (2)
- · I (R) $5959.1
- · Z (R) $8513
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure employees used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Site- An employee operating a pneumatic nail gun was not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not required to be worn by the employer. Ortega General construction Corp was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 17996345, citation number 1, item number 2b, and was affirmed as a final order on January 21. 2025, with respect to a workplace located at Saddle Rock Way, Manchester, NH 03102.
Recent events (2)
- · I (R) $0
- · Z (R) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $11,916 · Current $8,341 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Site- Employees working from the high and low roofs were not protected from falls between approximately 11 and 21 feet where fall protection was not utilized by the employer. Ortega General construction Corp was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 17996345, citation number 1, item number 3, and was affirmed as a final order on January 21. 2025, with respect to a workplace located at Saddle Rock Way, Manchester, NH 03102.
Recent events (2)
- · I (R) $8341.2
- · Z (R) $11916
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $8,513 · Current $5,959 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while working from the roof were not provided with fall protection training from the employer. Ortega General construction Corp was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 17996345, citation number 1, item number 1c, and was affirmed as a final order on January 21. 2025, with respect to a workplace located at Saddle Rock Way, Manchester, NH 03102.
Recent events (2)
- · I (R) $5959.1
- · Z (R) $8513
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $8,513 · Current $5,959 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Site- Employees using aluminum extension ladders to access the high and low roofs were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladders did not extend three feet above the landing surfaces. Ortega General construction Corp was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 17996345, citation number 1, item number 4a, and was affirmed as a final order on January 21. 2025, with respect to a workplace located at Saddle Rock Way, Manchester, NH 03102.
Recent events (2)
- · I (R) $5959.1
- · Z (R) $8513
More inspections at Ortega General Construction Corp
View Ortega General Construction Corp's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348982109.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.