Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ATA`S CONSTRUCTION INC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ATA`S CONSTRUCTION INC in 175 LLOYD AVENUE, PROVIDENCE, RI 02906 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348026295.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ata`S Construction INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ata`S Construction INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
175 LLOYD AVENUE
City
PROVIDENCE
State
RI
ZIP
02906
Mailing
29 PROSPECT STREET, MILFORD, MA 01757
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.452 K01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $2,483 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1): Platforms exceeded a height of 20 feet (6.1 m)  (a) Worksite - On or about  2/5/2025, an employee was exposed to fall hazards while working from a ladder jack scaffold platform that was approximately 23-feet in height above the lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2482.5
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $2,483 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   (a) Worksite - Front Entry Roof: On or about 2/5/2025, employees were exposed to fall hazards while working on a residential roof approximately 15 feet above the lower level without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2482.5
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,547 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support).  (a) Worksite: On or about 2/5/2025, an employee was exposed to fall hazards while working from an extension ladder approximately 23 feet above the ground level, while the foot of the ladder distance measured approximately 14 feet 4 inches from the wall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $500
  • — Z (S) $3547

1926.451 F03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2025
Penalty
Initial $398 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity.  (a) On or about 2/5/2025, employees were exposed to fall hazards from utilizing a ladder jack scaffold system that was not inspected prior to each work shift by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $398

1926.454 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2025
Abate by
Sep 12, 2025
Penalty
Initial $398 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  (a) Worksite: On or about 2/5/2025, the employer did not train each employee performing work while on a scaffold to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $398

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2025
Abate by
Sep 12, 2025
Penalty
Initial $398 · Current $199 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  (a) Worksite - On or about 2/5/2025, the employer could not provide certification of training for fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $199
  • — Z (O) $398

View Ata`S Construction INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348026295.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.