ENGLEWOOD, CO —
OSHA Inspection: THE GRANITE GUY, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of THE GRANITE GUY, LLC in 1855 W. UNION AVE STE R, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 348049255.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch The Granite GUY, LLC — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for The Granite GUY, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE GRANITE GUY, LLC
- Site address
- 1855 W. UNION AVE STE R
- City
- ENGLEWOOD
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80110
- Mailing
- 1855 W. UNION AVE STE R, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327991
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
17 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) On or about February 19, 2025 and at times prior, the employer did not ensure employees operating the Titan 1016 CNC router were protected from the point of operation, and rotating parts from the router. b) On or about February 19, 2025, and at times prior the employer did not ensure employees operating the Fusion 4045 Water jet saw were protected from the point of operation from the saw.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3547
- — Z (S) $3547
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,545 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: a) On or about February 19, 2025, and at times prior, the employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that employees performing servicing or maintenance on the Titan CNC router and the Fusion CNC saw where the unexpected energizing, startup, or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3545
- — C (S) $3547
- — Z (S) $3547
1910.1053 C
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(c):The employer did not ensure that no employee was exposed to an airborne concentration of respirable crystalline silica in excess of 50 ug/m3, calculated as an 8-hour TWA. a) On or about February 19, 2025, and at times prior, employees were exposed to respirable crystalline silica above the OSHA PEL and the Action Level during slab fabrication operations. The employer did not conduct exposure assessments for employees who may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above 50 ug/m3. OSHA conducted exposure assessments on May 16, 2025, and found an employee sampled that was exposed to an 8-hour Time-Weighted Average of 156 micrograms per cubic meter of respirable crystalline silica, above the Action Level of 25 ug/m3 and the OSHA PEL of 50 ug/m3.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3547
- — Z (S) $3547
1910.1053 F01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(1):The employer did not use engineering and work practice controls to reduce and maintain employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica to or below the PEL, unless the employer can demonstrate that such controls are not feasible. Wherever such feasible engineering and work practice controls were not sufficient to reduce employee exposure to or below the PEL, the employer shall nonetheless use them to reduce employee exposure to the lowest feasible level and shall supplement them with the use of respiratory protection that complies with the requirements of paragraph (g) of this section: a) On or about February 19, 2025, and at times prior, at times prior, the employer did not have sufficient engineering controls where employees were exposed to respirable crystalline silica above the action level and OSHA PEL. OSHA conducted exposure assessments on May 16, 2025, and found an employee sampled that was exposed to an 8-hour Time-Weighted Average of 156 micrograms per cubic meter of respirable crystalline silica, above the Action Level of 25 micrograms per cubic meter and the OSHA PEL of 50 ug/m3. The employees use water while conducting slab fabrication operations, but the water usage was not sufficient enough to bring the exposure levels below the OSHA PEL and action level.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 D01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(d)(1):The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(3) of this section: a) On or about February 19, 2025, and at times prior, employees were exposed to respirable crystalline silica above the Action Level during slab fabrication operations. The employer did not conduct exposure assessments for employees who may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level of 25 ug/m3. OSHA conducted exposure assessments on May 16, 2025, and found an employee sampled that was exposed to an 8-hour Time-Weighted Average of 156 micrograms per cubic meter of respirable crystalline silica, above the Action Level of 25 micrograms per cubic meter.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3547
- — C (S) $3547
- — Z (S) $3547
1910.1053 E01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(e)(1):The employer did not establish a regulated area wherever an employee's exposure to airborne concentrations of respirable crystalline silica was, or could have been reasonably expected to be, in excess of the PEL. a) On or about February 19, 2025, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that a silica regulated work area defined as an area, demarcated by the employer., where an employee's exposure to airborne concentrations of respirable crystalline silica exceeds, or can reasonably be expected to exceed, the PEL, was established in the shop area where employee exposure was over three times the established permissible exposure limit for respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 F02 I
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(2)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan: a) On or about February 19, 2025, and at times prior, the employer did not have a written exposure control plan where employees were known to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica. OSHA conducted exposure assessments on May 16, 2025, and found an employee sampled that was exposed to an 8-hour Time-Weighted Average of 156 micrograms per cubic meter of respirable crystalline silica, above the Action Level of 25 micrograms per cubic meter.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 G01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(g)(1): Where respiratory protection was required by this section, the employer did not provide each employee an appropriate respirator that complied with the requirements of this paragraph and 29 CFR 1910.134. a) On or about May 16, 2025, and at times prior, the employer did not provide each employee an appropriate respirator that complied with the requirements of this paragraph and 29 CFR 1910.134 when an employee was exposed to respirable crystalline silica at over 3 times the permissible exposure limit.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 J01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(j)(1): The employer did not include respirable crystalline silica in the program established to comply with the hazard communication standard (HCS) (29 CFR 1910.1200): a) On or about February 19, 2025, and at times prior, the employer did not establish a hazard communication program which included respirable crystalline silica. OSHA conducted exposure assessments on May 16, 2025, and found an employee sampled that was exposed to an 8-hour Time-Weighted Average of 156 micrograms per cubic meter of respirable crystalline silica, above the Action Level of 25 micrograms per cubic meter and the OSHA PEL of 50 ug/m3.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 I01 I
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(i)(1)(i): The employer did not make medical surveillance available at no cost to each employee, and at a reasonable time and place, for each employee who has been occupationally exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level for 30 or more days per year: a) On or about February 19, 2025, and at times prior, employees were exposed to respirable crystalline silica above the OSHA PEL and the Action Level during slab fabrication operations. The employer did not provide medical evaluations for employees who may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above 25 ug/m3 and 50 ug/m3. OSHA conducted exposure assessments on May 16, 2025, and found an employee sampled that was exposed to an 8-hour Time-Weighted Average of 156 micrograms per cubic meter of respirable crystalline silica, above the Action Level of 25 up/m3 and the OSHA PEL of 50 ug/m3.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3547
- — Z (S) $3547
1910.1053 I02
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(i)(2): The employer did not make available an initial (baseline) medical examination within 30 days after initial assignment when the employee had not received a medical examination that meets the requirements of this section within the last three years: a) On or about February 19, 2025, and at times prior, employees were exposed to respirable crystalline silica above the OSHA PEL and the Action Level during slab fabrication operations. The employer did not provide an initial (baseline) medical examination for employees conducting slab fabrication operations, within 30 days after initial assignment. OSHA conducted exposure assessments on May 16, 2025, and found an employee sampled that was exposed to an 8-hour Time-Weighted Average of 156 micrograms per cubic meter of respirable crystalline silica, above the Action Level of 25 ug/m3 and the OSHA PEL of 50 ug/m3.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 H02 I
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(h)(2)(i):The employer allowed compressed air to be used to clean clothing or surfaces where such activity could contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica without being used in conjunction with a ventilation system to capture blown dust. a) On or about February 19, 2025, and at times prior, the employer allowed compressed air to be used to clean clothing or surfaces where such activity could contribute to employee's exposure to respirable crystallin silica. OSHA conducted exposure assessments on May 16, 2025, and found an employee sampled that was exposed to an 8-hour Time-Weighted Average of 156 micrograms per cubic meter of respirable crystalline silica, above the Action Level of 25 micrograms per cubic meter and the OSHA PEL of 50 ug/m3.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.22 A03
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that walking-working surfaces are maintained free of hazards such as sharp or protruding objects, loose boards, corrosion, leaks, spills, snow, and ice. a) On or about February 19, 2025, and at times prior the employer did not ensure that walking-working surfaces were maintained free of hazards, in that the grate behind the Fusion Water Jet saw was broken, exposing employees to an open grate.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1):Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:. a) On or about February 19, 2025, and at times prior the employer did not ensure that employees using compressed air at 80 psi were required to wear protective eye and face equipment.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.: a) On or about February 19, 2025, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that compressed air was not used for cleaning employee's self, and that when used for cleaning purposes the compressed air was reduced to less than 30 psi.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.303 G01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1):Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment: a) On or about February 19, 2025, and at times prior the employer did not ensure sufficient access and working space was provided around the emergency electrical disconnect for the Titan 1016 CNC router and Fusion 4045 Water Jet Saw.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY EQUIPMENT AND CONDITION(S)) (STATE HAZARD(S) TO EMPLOYEE(S))\ a) On or about February 19, 2025, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that the outlet receptacle with an extension cord plugged in, located below the mezzanine was constructed so that there were no exposed current-carrying parts, in that the receptacle cover was missing.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at The Granite GUY, LLC
View The Granite GUY, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327991)
Jul 17, 2026
MG Construction Granite & Marble · NEWBURY PARK, CA
Jul 16, 2026
Granite and Marble Concepts INC. · EL CAJON, CA
Jul 16, 2026
Eurostone LLC · MURFREESBORO, TN
Jul 15, 2026
United Marble & Granite · SANTA CLARA, CA
Jul 14, 2026
Frank'S Marble & Granite, LLC. · RED LION, PA
More inspections in CO
Jul 16, 2026
Glozer, LLC · FORT COLLINS, CO
Jul 16, 2026
Wavelynx Technologies LLC · BROOMFIELD, CO
Jul 15, 2026
Elmer Contractor LLC · COLORADO SPRINGS, CO
Jul 15, 2026
John'S Collision Repair, INC. · SHERIDAN, CO
Jul 15, 2026
Brakes Plus, INC · CENTENNIAL, CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348049255.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.