OSSIPEE, NH —
OSHA Inspection: SPARTECH LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SPARTECH LLC in 698 BROWNS RIDGE ROAD, OSSIPEE, NH 03864 (NAICS 326111). OSHA activity number 348079625.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SPARTECH LLC
- Site address
- 698 BROWNS RIDGE ROAD
- City
- OSSIPEE
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03864
- Mailing
- ATTN: JULI BOCK 11650 LAKESIDE CROSSING COURT, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63146
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326111
- Employees
- 31
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $11,705 · Current $5,853 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees from hazards associated with struck by hazards: Extrusion- Employees loading, unloading, and working around Industrial steel storage racks with the use of powered industrial trucks were not protected from struck by hazards where the employer did not identify and post the capacities of the steel storage racks, properly anchor steel storage racks to the floor, remove damaged storage racks from service, and provide a storage rack design professional to evaluate damaged storage rack components.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5852.5
- — Z (S) $11705
1910.28 B01 I
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $11,705 · Current $5,853 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i):Except as provided elsewhere in this section 29 CFR 1910.28, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by one or more of the systems described in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Upper Mezzanine - Employees working from the mezzanine and employees performing maintenance work on extrusion equipment were not protected from a fall of approximately 8 feet where extrusion equipment was removed, leaving a floor opening that was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5852.5
- — Z (S) $11705
1910.303 B06
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $11,705 · Current $5,853 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(6):Conductors or equipment were located in damp or wet locations; where exposed to gases, fumes, vapors, liquids, or other agents that had a deteriorating effect on the conductors or equipment; were not identified for use in the operating environment: Extrusion Department, First Floor - Employees working near electrical panel DP1 were not protected from arc flash injuries where water was actively leaking onto and into the top of the panel causing corrosion to the electrical equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5852.5
- — Z (S) $11705
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $16,385 · Current $8,193 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments: Extrusion Department - Employees exposed to electric shock while voltage testing and making repairs to electrical equipment were not provided with safe electrical work practice training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $8192.5
- — Z (S) $16385
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed: Site - Employees exposed to electric shock while voltage testing were not provided with insulated gloves and FR rated clothing to protect the body.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 F02
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident: Extrusion Department, First Floor - Each circuit breaker located in electrical panel DP1 were not labeled to indicate their purpose.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.303 G01 II
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage: Extrusion Department, First Floor - Working space in front of the Sorgel three phase floor mounted transformer and the electric disconnect for electrical panel MDP were used for storage of material and tools.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.304 B03 II A
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(b)(3)(ii)(A): All 125-volt, single-phase, 15, 20 and 30-ampere receptacle outlets that are not part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and that are in use by personnel did not have ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection for personnel. Extrusion Department, First Floor - A submersible sump pump was plugged into a flexible cord where the outlet receptacle powering the flexible cord and pump was not protected by a ground fault circuit interrupter.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.333 B02 III A
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2025
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(iii)(A): A lock and a tag were not placed on each disconnecting means used to deenergize circuits and equipment on which work was to be performed: Extrusion Department, Electrical panel DP1 - Two 240 volt circuit breakers were turned off and energy isolating devices were attached to the circuit breakers without a lock or tag applied.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Spartech LLC
View Spartech LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326111)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348079625.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.