GULFPORT, MS —
OSHA Inspection: LEMUS FRAMING LLC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LEMUS FRAMING LLC. in 400 BEACH DRIVE, GULFPORT, MS 39507 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 348090606.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LEMUS FRAMING LLC.
- Site address
- 400 BEACH DRIVE
- City
- GULFPORT
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 39507
- Mailing
- 4322 DEBELLEVUE DR., BATON ROUGE, LA 70809
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B02 I
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2025
- Abate by
- Apr 28, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $6,620 · Current $3,972 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)(i): Each employee who was constructing a leading edge 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Note: If the employer could demonstrate that it was infeasible or created a greater hazard to use these systems, a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502 should have been developed and implemented. (a) Top of framed walls - On or about March 7, 2025 the employer instructed his employees to work from the top of the framed walls greater than 11 feet high without any type of fall safety system exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3972
- — Z (S) $6620
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2025
- Abate by
- May 19, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $6,620 · Current $3,972 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. (a) Front of building - On or about March 7, 2025, the employer had employees use the 6 foot step ladder to gain access to the top of the first floor framed walls that was not tall enough to extend 3 feet above the top plate edge and no other supports were used to gain access exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3972
- — Z (S) $6620
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2025
- Abate by
- May 19, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13):The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step: (a) Front of building - On or about March 7, 2025, the employer had employees use the 6 foot step ladder to gain access to the top of the walls 11 feet 5 inches high, having employees using the top step to gain access to the top of the walls exposing them to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2025
- Abate by
- May 19, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $531 · Current $319 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) Top of first floor walls - On or about March 7, 2025, the employer had employees working from the top of the first floor framed walls to install the second floor rafters without them being trained in fall hazards exposing them fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $318.6
- — Z (O) $531
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2025
- Abate by
- May 19, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $531 · Current $319 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)Note: 29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2) may be cited as an additional violation to support this requirement. (a) Work site - On or about March 7, 2025, the employer had employees use the step ladder that were to short to gain access to the top of the first floor without providing them ladder safety training exposing them to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $318.6
- — Z (O) $531
More inspections at Lemus Framing LLC.
View Lemus Framing LLC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348090606.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.