ONEIDA, NY —
OSHA Inspection: H.P. HOOD LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of H.P. HOOD LLC in 588 BROAD STREET, ONEIDA, NY 13421 (NAICS 311511). OSHA activity number 348107673.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- H.P. HOOD LLC
- Site address
- 588 BROAD STREET
- City
- ONEIDA
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13421
- Mailing
- 252 GENESEE STREET, ONEIDA, NY 13421
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311511
- Employees
- 260
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 D03 II
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2025
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $11,823 · Current $11,823
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices: a) On or about 3/13/2025, Process side engine room, The employer did not comply with chosen RAGAGEP such as IIAR 2 section 16.2.2, when the sight glass for the Pumpout Distiller vessel was not protected from damage from equipment movement/storage near the sight glass. b) On or about 3/13/2025, The employer did not comply with chosen RAGAGEP such as IIAR 2 section 6.10.2, when doors to the Process side engine room were not tight fitting and they would not close completely. c) On or about 3/13/2025, The employer did not comply with chosen RAGAGEP such as IIAR 2 section 6.10.2, when the door to the Process side satellite engine room were not tight fitting and they would not shut completely.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $11823
- — Z (S) $11823
1910.119 J02
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2025
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $16,550 · Current $16,550
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish or implement written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment: a) On or about 3/13/2025, Throughout the Anhydrous Ammonia Refrigeration System, the employer did not establish & implement written procedures to address external corrosion, including corrosion under insulation, on process equipment, such as piping, valves and vessels.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $16550
- — Z (S) $16550
1910.119 J04 I
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2025
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $16,550 · Current $16,550
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i):The employer did not perform inspection and tests on process equipment: a) On or about 3/13/2025, The employer did not comply with their MI Compliance Calendar , in that pipes were not subjected to non-destructive testing (NDT) at the required 5 year interval. b) On or about 3/13/2025, the employer did not comply with their MI Compliance Calendar, in that vessels were not subjected to non-destructive testing (NDT) at the required 5 year interval. c) On or about 3/13/2025, the employer did not comply with their chosen RAGAGEP, IIAR 6, in that the employer did not perform corrosion under insulation inspections in areas with visible insulation defects, including but not limited to the suction trap and the dump trap.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $16550
- — Z (S) $16550
1910.119 J05
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2025
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $11,823 · Current $11,823
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer did not correct deficiencies in equipment that were outside acceptable limits before use: a) On or about 3/11/2025, Elevated process piping in the Process side engine room was in use with vibration, exerting stresses on pipe connections. b) On or about 3/13/2025, The liquid injection receiver had a gauge that was unreadable. c) On or about 3/13/2025, Frick compressor #5 located in the Process side engine room had compressor piping that was rubbing against each other.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $11823
- — Z (S) $11823
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2025
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $9,457 · Current $9,457
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i):Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose: a) On or about 3/13/2025, Frick compressor #5 located in the Process side engine room was observed to have an uncovered junction box with live electrical wires, exposing employees to shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $9457
- — Z (S) $9457
1910.119 D03 I B
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2025
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B): The employer's piping and instrument diagrams were not accurate and did not represent equipment that was existing and was part of the process: a) On or about 3/13/2025, Process side engine room, two check valves that were in place on Frick compressor #5 were not annotated on P&ID P-01. b) On or about 3/13/2025, Process Side engine room, gauge on the liquid injection receiver, at valve 1284, was not annotated on P&ID P-03.
Recent events (2)
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at H.P. Hood LLC
View H.P. Hood LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311511)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348107673.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.