NEPTUNE, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: MASTERCRAFT IRON, INC
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of MASTERCRAFT IRON, INC in 1111 10TH AVENUE, NEPTUNE, NJ 07753 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 348183815.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MASTERCRAFT IRON, INC
- Site address
- 1111 10TH AVENUE
- City
- NEPTUNE
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07753
- Mailing
- 1111 10TH AVENUE, NEPTUNE, NJ 07753
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332312
- Employees
- 22
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,128 · Current $1,234 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: a)Production area outside painting area: An employee using a 3M half face elastomeric respirator voluntarily was not provided the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 prior to use on or about 4/16/25.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1234
- — Z (S) $2128
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii):The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: a) Painting area in outside production area: The employer did not develop a written respiratory protection program for an employee voluntarily wearing a 3M half face elastomeric respirator on or about 4/16/25.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Painting area in outside production area: The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to an employee voluntarily wearing a 3M half face elastomeric respirator prior to use, on or about 4/16/25.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H01
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1):Respirators were not cleaned and disinfected using the procedures in Appendix B-2 of 29 CFR 1910.134 or equivalent procedures recommended by the respirator manufacturer: a) Production area outside painting area. The employer did not ensure that an employee that wore a respirator when painting maintained the respirator in a clean condition, on or about 4/16/25.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H03 II A
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(3)(ii)(A):Respirator inspections did not include a check of respirator function, tightness of connections, and the condition of the various parts including, but not limited to, the facepiece, head straps, valves, connecting tube, and cartridges, canisters or filters: a) Painting area in outside production area: An employee using a half face elastomeric respirator voluntarily was not required to inspect the respirator prior to use. The respirator was missing an exhalation valve, on or about 4/16/25
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 30, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $2,057 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Throughout the facility. Employees were not trained on the hazardous chemicals used in their workplace, such as but not limited to Sherwin Williams E61 AC 82 primer coating , a corrosive chemical, observed on or about 4/16/25. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (4)
- — P (S) $2057
- — P (S) $2057
- — I (S) $2057
More inspections at Mastercraft Iron, INC
View Mastercraft Iron, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332312)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348183815.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.