OSHA Inspection: JOSE LUIS LOPEZ

Issued

May 2, 2025

Penalty

Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  a)  At 3120 Camphor Road, Lot 14 Eagle Pointe, Pensacola, Florida:  On April 22, 2025; the employer allowed his employees to operate pneumatic nail guns without eye protection while performing roofing activities exposing his employees to struck-by hazards.

Issued

May 2, 2025

Abate by

May 16, 2025

Penalty

Initial $4,256 · Current $4,256

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   a)  At 3120 Camphor Road, Lot 14 Eagle Pointe, Pensacola, Florida:  On April 22, 2025; the employer allowed his employees to perform roofing activities without first ensuring his employees were trained on the hazards associated with falls to include but not limited to setting up and inspecting fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of 10 feet 1 inch to the ground below.

Issued

May 2, 2025

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a)  At 3120 Camphor Road, Lot 14 Eagle Pointe, Pensacola, Florida:  On April 22, 2025; the employer allowed his employees to perform roofing activities without fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of 10 feet 1 inch to the ground below.

Issued

May 2, 2025

Penalty

Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a)  At 3120 Camphor Road, Lot 14 Eagle Pointe, Pensacola, Florida:  On April 22, 2025; the employer allowed his employees to use an extension ladder to gain access to the roof and the rials of the ladder did not extend three feet above the roof landing to provide safe access exposing his employees to a fall hazard of 10 feet 1 inch to the ground below.