Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EFREN LUGO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EFREN LUGO in 16824 RICHARDS STREET, TINLEY PARK, IL 60477 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348268947.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Efren Lugo — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Efren Lugo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EFREN LUGO
Site address
16824 RICHARDS STREET
City
TINLEY PARK
State
IL
ZIP
60477
Mailing
1 B EAST DUNDEE QUARTER DRIVE, PALATINE, IL 60074
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,256 · Current $2,128 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure employees used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a. On or about May 27, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to eye injuries while operating a pneumatic nail gun without wearing eye protection while installing roof shingles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2128
  • — Z (S) $4256

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,256 · Current $2,144 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  a. On or about May 27, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, eleven (11) feet seven (7) inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2144
  • — Z (S) $4256

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2025
Penalty
Initial $4,256 · Current $2,128 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.  a. On or about May 27, 2025, the portable ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least three (3') feet above the upper landing surface nor was it secured at the top, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2128
  • — Z (S) $4256

View Efren Lugo's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348268947.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.