Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: STRUPCO, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of STRUPCO, INC. in 2245 SOUTH 9TH STREET, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62703 (NAICS 326299). OSHA activity number 348407974.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Strupco, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Strupco, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
STRUPCO, INC.
Site address
2245 SOUTH 9TH STREET
City
SPRINGFIELD
State
IL
ZIP
62703
Mailing
2245 SOUTH 9TH STREET, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62703
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326299
Employees
21
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2026
Abate by
May 1, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,256 · Current $1,800 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:  On or about July 30, 2025, employees were exposed to crushing injuries from the operation of two separate 5-ton underhung cranes, and the employer did not conduct frequent and periodic inspections in accordance with ASME B30.11-2004.   These items include but are not limited to the following:  a.	Hoist, b.	Upper limit device on the hoist, c.	Operating mechanisms for proper operation, proper adjustment, and unusual sounds, and d.	Tanks, valves, pumps, lines, and other parts of air or hydraulic systems for leakage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $4256

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $5,958 · Current $5,958
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Except as provided elsewhere in this section 29 CFR 1910.28, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by one or more of the systems described in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i):  On or about July 30, 2025, an employee was exposed to fall hazards without fall protection from two separate mezzanines in the company.  These fall hazards instances included the following:  a.	South Building Mezzanine - 8 feet  b.	North Building Mezzanine - 10 feet 2 inches
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5958
  • — Z (S) $5958

1910.28 B11 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(11)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each flight of stairs having at least 3 treads and at least 4 risers is equipped with stair rail systems and handrails as described in 29 CFR 1910.28 Table D-2-Stairway Handrail Requirements:   On or about July 30, 2025, an employee was exposed to fall hazards of up to 8 feet, while accessing the mezzanine in the South Building, due the lack of a stair rail system on the stairway.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2026
Abate by
May 1, 2026
Penalty
Initial $5,958 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1): The authorized employee did not have knowledge of the type and magnitude of the energy, the hazards of the energy to be controlled, and the method or means to control the energy before the authorized or affected employee turned off equipment.  On or about July 30, 2025, the employer did not determine through reviews conducted between an observer and authorized employees if employees who performed servicing and maintenance activities on equipment within the facility had sufficient knowledge of the hazards of the energy to be controlled and means of controlling them.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $5958

1910.147 C07 I A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2026
Abate by
Jan 28, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control:  On or about August 27, 2025, an employee was exposed to amputation hazards while changing tooling/die in a Piranha Punch Press, and the employer did not provide the employee with authorized employee lockout training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 D

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2026
Abate by
Jan 22, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):  On or about August 27, 2025, an employee was exposed to amputation hazards while changing tooling/die in a Piranha Punch Press. The employer failed to implement energy control application steps as the machine was not shut down or turned off to perform the servicing work [per the 1910.147(d)(2) requirements].  As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect employees from machine service and setup hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 E02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2026
Abate by
May 1, 2026
Penalty
Initial $3,405 · Current $1,042 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:  On or about July 30, 2025, employees were exposed to potential fire hazards through the use of employer provided portable fire extinguishers, and the employer did not perform monthly visual inspections of the fire extinguishers to ensure that they were fully charged, undamaged, and ready for immediate employee use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1042
  • — Z (S) $3405

1910.157 G01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2026
Abate by
Jan 28, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:  On or about July 30, 2025, employees were exposed to potential fire hazards through the use of employer provided portable fire extinguishers, and the employer did not provide an educational program to employees, in order to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards associated with incipient stage firefighting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 Q01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,256 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1): Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service, and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel:  On or about July 30, 2025, employees were exposed to physical injury from the use of a powered industrial truck (Hyster 30/1221), with a faulty rear steer assembly, and the employer did not take the forklift out of service until restored to safe operating condition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4256

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2026
Abate by
May 1, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  On or about July 30, 2025, employees operated powered industrial trucks in the facility daily, and the employer did not conduct daily powered industrial truck inspections prior to usage to ensure safe operating conditions of the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2026
Abate by
Jan 22, 2026
Penalty
Initial $11,916 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(2): Guard(s) on machine(s) were not affixed to the machine or secured elsewhere when attachment to the machine was not possible or so installed that they offered accident hazards in themselves:  On or about August 26, 2025, an employee was exposed to amputation hazards while operating a Piranha Punch Press, and the employer did not ensure the machine guarding was securely affixed to the machine or other attachment point to prevent the guard from being moved and thus exposing a hazard or creating a hazard itself.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6000
  • — Z (R) $11916

View Strupco, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348407974.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.