OSHA Inspection: MALAGON GROUP, LLC

Issued

Dec 19, 2025

Abate by

Jun 1, 2026

Penalty

Initial $3,972 · Current $1,986 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  At the construction site located at 118 W Walnut Street in Raymore, Missouri 64083, on or about July 23, 2025, and at times prior: Employees performing masonry work were exposed to eye injuries, such as particles in the eyes, scratches and abrasions while cutting brick without wearing any eye or face protection.

Issued

Dec 19, 2025

Abate by

Jun 1, 2026

Penalty

Initial $1,702 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program that included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   At the construction site located at 118 W Walnut Street in Raymore, Missouri 64083, on or about July 23, 2025, and at times prior: Employees performing masonry work were exposed to hazardous dust from working with bricks and cement mixture containing respirable crystalline silica. The employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program to train employees in the safety and health hazards, precautions, emergency response and safety data sheet information for all the chemicals and processes used in the workplace including respirable crystalline silica dust.

Issued

Dec 19, 2025

Abate by

Jun 1, 2026

Penalty

Initial $3,972 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.  At the construction site located at 118 W Walnut Street in Raymore, Missouri 64083, on or about July 23, 2023, and at times prior: Employees performing masonry work were exposed to asthma, COPD, and permanent lung damage, associated with respirable crystalline silica dust, while dry cutting bricks using saws that were not equipped with integrated water delivery system that continuously feeds water to the blade.

Issued

Dec 19, 2025

Abate by

Jun 1, 2026

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1153(d)(2)(i):The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:  At the construction site located at 118 W Walnut Street in Raymore, Missouri 64083, on or about July 23, 2023, and at times prior: Employees performing masonry work were exposed to asthma, COPD, and permanent lung damage, associated with respirable crystalline silica dust,. The employer had not assessed exposure of employees performing and working in proximity to masonry work.