LONGMONT, CO —
OSHA Inspection: RESOURCE LABEL GROUP, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RESOURCE LABEL GROUP, LLC in 880 WEAVER PARK ROAD, LONGMONT, CO 80501 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 348420035.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RESOURCE LABEL GROUP, LLC
- Site address
- 880 WEAVER PARK ROAD
- City
- LONGMONT
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80501
- Mailing
- 2550 MERIDIAN BLVD SUITE 370, FRANKLIN, TN 37067
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323111
- Employees
- 112
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2025
- Abate by
- Dec 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $9,457 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c):The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: a) On or about August 4, 2025, the employer did not have a developed written respiratory program where employees were required to wear 3M tight-fitting respirators with P100 filters while clearing nuisance dust from the rollers.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $9457
- — Z (S) $9457
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2025
- Abate by
- Dec 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Printer Room and Lab: On or about August 4, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation prior to requiring the use of 3M tight-fitting respirators with P100 filters while clearing nuisance dust from the rollers.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) 880: On or about August 4, 2025, the employer did not provide fit testing for tight-fitting respirators to employees required to wear 3M half face respirators with P100 filters, exposing employees to respiratory hazards while cleaning out printers.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $14,187 · Current $6,093 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: a) Manufacturing Area: On or about August 4, 2025, employees required to wear tight-fitting 3M half-face respirators with P100 filters while clearing out extractors had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $6093
- — C (S) $14187
- — Z (S) $14187
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $6,620 · Current $3,634 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) On or about August 4, 2025, the employer did not maintain a written hazard communication which includes site-specific information such as a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present on site, methods the employer will use to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks, or program managers where employees are required to work with hazardous chemicals including but not limited to Fasco Epoxies Super Slick Stuff Aerosol, Enviro-Pro degreaser, and Actega UV Glosscoat.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3634
- — C (S) $6620
- — Z (S) $6620
1910.1200 F06
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2025
- Abate by
- Apr 30, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $7,093 · Current $3,965 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6):The employer used written materials, such as signs, placards, process sheets, or batch tickets in lieu of affixing labels to individual stationary process containers that failed to identify the container(s) to which they were applicable and did not convey the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): a) On or about August 4, 2025, the employer failed to ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provides at least general information regarding hazardous chemicals including but not limited to Fasco Epoxies Super Slick Stuff Aerosol, Enviro-Pro degreaser, and Actega UV Glosscoat.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3965
- — C (S) $7093
- — Z (S) $7093
More inspections at Resource Label Group, LLC
View Resource Label Group, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323111)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348420035.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.