TINLEY PARK, IL —
OSHA Inspection: D. CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of D. CONSTRUCTION, INC. in W OF 80TH AVE. AND 183RD ST. BETWEEN 80TH AVE. AND TRALEE TRAIL, TINLEY PARK, IL 60487 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 348462169.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- D. CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- W OF 80TH AVE. AND 183RD ST. BETWEEN 80TH AVE. AND TRALEE TRAIL
- City
- TINLEY PARK
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60487
- Mailing
- 1488 S. BROADWAY ST., COAL CITY, IL 60416
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237310
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $5,674 · Current $9,458
S103
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On August 25, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure an employee required to wear a tight-fitting half facepiece respirator while dowel drilling was medically evaluated to determine their ability to use a respirator prior to the fit test and prior to requiring the employee to wear the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $9458
- — Z (S) $5674
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $9,458 · Current $0 Reduced
S103
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting respirator is fit tested prior to initial use, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, make or model) is used, and at least annually thereafter: On August 25, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure an employee performing dowel drilling was fit tested prior to initial use and/or at least annually thereafter, thereby, exposing the employee to the hazards commonly associated with silica.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $9458
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $9,458 · Current $0 Reduced
S103
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: On August 25, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure an employee required to wear a tight-fitting half facepiece respirator while performing dowel drilling was clean shaven and did not have facial hair that could interfere with the seal of the respirator, thereby, exposing the employee to the hazards associated with silica.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $9458
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2026
- Abate by
- Feb 10, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $9,458 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable, and effective annual training to employees who were required to use respirators: On or about August 25, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure an employee required to wear a tight-fitting half facepiece respirator while conducting dowel drilling operations received effective respirator training at least annually, thereby, exposing them to the hazards commonly associated with silica and respirator use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $9458
1926.1153 C01
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $9,458 · Current $9,458
S103
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer shall fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section: On August 25, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was performing dowel drilling operations and drilling into material that contained silica, which was creating dust clouds. The employer did not ensure a dust collection system was utilized to capture the dust, thereby, exposing the employee to the hazards associated with silica dust.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $9458
- — Z (S) $9458
1926.1153 D01
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
S103
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees were not exposed to an airborne concentration of respirable crystalline silica in excess of 50 ug/m3, calculated as an 8-hour TWA, for tasks not listed in Table 1 or when the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection described in Table 1 were not fully and properly implemented: On August 25, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was performing dowel drilling operations and drilling into material that contained silica, which was creating dust clouds. The employer did not ensure a dust collection system was utilized to capture the dust and did not conduct an exposure assessment for the task, thereby, exposing the employee to the hazards associated with silica dust.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1153 G01 I
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2026
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
S103
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1)(i): The exposure control plan did not contain a description of the tasks in the workplace that involve exposure to respirable crystalline silica: On or about August 25, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure that the implemented exposure control plan for silica contained all required elements including a description of the tasks in the workplace that involve exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1926.1153 G01 II
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2026
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
S103
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1)(ii): The exposure control plan did not contain a description of the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica for each task: On or about August 25, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure that the implemented exposure control plan for silica contained all required elements including a description of the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection used to limit exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1926.1153 G02
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2026
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
S103
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(2): The employer did not review and evaluate the effectiveness of the written exposure control plan at least annually and update it as necessary: On or about August 25, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure that the implemented exposure control plan for silica was reviewed and updated as necessary.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1926.1153 G03
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
S103
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(3): The employer did not make the written exposure control plan readily available for examination and copying, upon request, to each employee covered by this section, their designated representatives, the Assistant Secretary and the Director: On August 25, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure the written exposure control plan was readily available upon request made on-site by representatives of the Assistant Secretary of Labor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at D. Construction, INC.
View D. Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237310)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348462169.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.