Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ADONEL CONCRETE CORP.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ADONEL CONCRETE CORP. in 1926 SKEES ROAD, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33411 (NAICS 327331). OSHA activity number 348612573.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Adonel Concrete Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Adonel Concrete Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1926 SKEES ROAD
City
WEST PALM BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
33411
Mailing
242 NW LEJUNE ROAD, 4TH FLOOR, MIAMI, FL 33126
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327331
Employees
39
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2026
Abate by
Feb 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $8,513 · Current $5,959 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-between hazards:   a) On or about November 25, 2025, at 1926 Skees Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33411, an employee was exposed to struck-by and caught-between hazards while operating a Tailift Forklift (Model Number: PFD36; SN: PTA54210) while unrestrained.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5959.1
  • — Z (S) $8513

1910.95 D01

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2026
Penalty
Initial $5,107 · Current $3,575 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR  1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:  a) On or about November 25, 2025, at 1926 Skees Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33411, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program for employees exposed to noise equal to or exceeding the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 dBA while working in the block plant. An employee was exposed to continuous noise levels at 225.3% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average action level (85 dBA). The equivalent dBA of 225.3% is 95.8 dBA. The sampling was performed for 468 minutes, and zero exposure was assumed for the 12-minute period not sampled.   b) On or about November 25, 2025, at 1926 Skees Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33411, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program for employees exposed to noise equal to or exceeding the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 dBA while working in the block plant. An employee was exposed to continuous noise levels at 162.7% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average action level (85 dBA). The equivalent dBA of 162.7% is 93.5 dBA. The sampling was performed for 465 minutes, and zero exposure was assumed for the 15-minute period not sampled.   c) On or about November 25, 2025, at 1926 Skees Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33411, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program for employees exposed to noise equal to or exceeding the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 dBA while working in the block plant. An employee was exposed to continuous noise levels at 131.9% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average action level (85 dBA). The equivalent dBA of 131.9% is 91.9 dBA. The sampling was performed for 462 minutes, and zero exposure was assumed for the 18-minute period not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3574.9
  • — Z (S) $5107

1910.95 K03 II

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2026
Abate by
Feb 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(k)(3)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each employee was informed of the purpose of hearing protectors, the advantages, disadvantages, and attenuation of various types, and instructions on selection, fitting, use and care:  a) On or about November 25, 2025 at 1926 Skees Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33411, the employer did not ensure that each employee was informed of the attenuation of various types of hearing protectors and instructions on selection of hearing protectors for employees exposed to noise equal to or exceeding the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 dBA while working in the block plant.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 L03

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2026
Abate by
Feb 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(l)(3): The employer did not provide, upon request, all materials related to the employer's training and education program pertaining to 29 CFR 1910.95 to the Assistant Secretary and the Director:  a) On or about November 25, 2025 at 1926 Skees Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33411, the employer did not provide all materials related to the employer's training and education program pertaining to 29 CFR 1910.95 for employees exposed to noise equal to or exceeding the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 dBA while working in the block plant.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1053 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2026
Penalty
Initial $5,107 · Current $3,575 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR 1910.1053(d)(1): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(3) of this section:  a) On or about November 25, 2025 at 1926 Skees Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33411, the employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(3) of this section for employees exposed to respirable crystalline silica dust inside the concrete block plant.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3574.9
  • — Z (S) $5107

1910.1053 J01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2026
Abate by
Feb 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR 1910.1053(j)(1): The employer did not include respirable crystalline silica in the program established to comply with the hazard communication standard (HCS) (29 CFR 1910.1200):  a) On or about November 25, 2025 at 1926 Skees Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33411, the employer did not include respirable crystalline silica in the program established to comply with the hazard communication standard (HCS) (29 CFR 1910.1200) for employees exposed to respirable crystalline silica while working in the concrete block plant.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2026
Abate by
Feb 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) On or about November 25, 2025, at 1926 Skees Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33411, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures for employees exposed to respirable crystalline silica dust who are required to wear 3M Full Facepiece respirators while cleaning hoppers in the block plant.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2026
Abate by
Feb 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) On or about November 25, 2025, at 1926 Skees Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33411, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace for employees required to wear 3M Full Facepiece respirators while cleaning hoppers in the block plant.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2026
Abate by
Feb 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  a) On or about November 25, 2025, at 1926 Skees Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33411, the employer did not provide fit testing for employees using tight-fitting facepiece respirators prior to initial use of the respirator for employees required to wear 3M Full Facepiece respirators while cleaning hoppers in the block plant.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Adonel Concrete Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348612573.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.