OSHA Inspection: NR LEE RESTORATION, LTD.

Issued

Mar 16, 2026

Penalty

Initial $13,902 · Current $0 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(10):"Roofing work on Low-slope roofs." Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width (see Appendix A to subpart M of this part), the use of a safety monitoring system alone [i.e. without the warning line system] is permitted.  a) On or about February 13, 2026, the employer failed to ensure that employees performing roofing work on the Butler County Courthouse were utilizing conventional means of fall protection, exposing employees to fall hazards of approximately 90 feet to the ground below.

Issued

Mar 16, 2026

Abate by

Apr 20, 2026

Penalty

Initial $13,902 · Current $0 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1):The employer shall verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record. The written certification record shall contain the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. If the employer relies on training conducted by another employer or completed prior to the effective date of this section, the certification record shall indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training.  a) On or about February 13, 2026, the employer did not ensure that written certification of training records for fall protection were being maintained in that the employer did not have training records for employees performing roofing work on the commercial building, exposing employees to fall hazards greater than 90 feet.