Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: SULLIVAN PRECISION PLATE, LLC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SULLIVAN PRECISION PLATE, LLC. in 140 W OKLAHOMA AVE, MILWAUKEE, WI 53207 (NAICS 332313). OSHA activity number 348758699.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sullivan Precision Plate, LLC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sullivan Precision Plate, LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
140 W OKLAHOMA AVE
City
MILWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53207
Mailing
460 CARDINAL LANE, HARTLAND, WI 53029
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332313
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B11 II

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2026
Abate by
Sep 2, 2026
Penalty
Initial $3,972 · Current $1,986 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.28(b)(11)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each flight of stairs having at least 3 treads and at least 4 risers is equipped with stair rail systems and handrails as described in 29 CFR 1910.28 Table D-2-Stairway Handrail Requirements.  (a) On or about February 19, 2026, at burn table #1; employees were using a 3-tread 4-riser stairway to access and egress the top of the 30-inch tall water type burn table, were not protected from falling by a stair rail.   (b) On or about February 19, 2026 at burn table #2; employees were using a 3-tread 4-riser stairway to access and egress the top of the 30-inch tall water type burn table, were not protected from falling by a stair rail.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1986
  • · Z (S) $3972

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2026
Abate by
Sep 2, 2026
Penalty
Initial $8,276 · Current $8,276
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) On or about February 19, 2026, and dates prior, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program, to include worksite specific procedures to protect employee's required to use respiratory protection while performing work tasks in the blast booth.  All provisions of 29 CFR 1910.134(c) through (m) must be contained in a written Respiratory Protection program. Key elements include but are not limited to: 1) Respirator/filter selection 2) Filter change out schedule 3) Medical clearance 4) Fit testing 5) Annual training on respirator use, limitation, cleaning, and storage. 6) Program review
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $8276

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2026
Abate by
Sep 2, 2026
Penalty
Initial $8,276 · Current $4,965 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) On or about February 19, 2026, and dates prior, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program, to include worksite specific procedures to protect employee's required to use respiratory protection while performing work tasks in the blast booth.  All provisions of 29 CFR 1910.134(c) through (m) must be contained in a written Respiratory Protection program. Key elements include but are not limited to: 1) Respirator/filter selection 2) Filter change out schedule 3) Medical clearance 4) Fit testing 5) Annual training on respirator use, limitation, cleaning, and storage. 6) Program review
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4965
  • · Z (S) $8276

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2026
Abate by
Nov 10, 2026
Penalty
Initial $3,972 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  (a) On or about February 19, 2026, the employer did not perform air sampling to evaluate employee(s) exposure to steel plate shot blasting, exposing employees to potential air borne contaminants.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3972

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2026
Abate by
Sep 2, 2026
Penalty
Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972
29 CFR  1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  (a) On or about February 19, 2026, the employer did not perform air sampling to evaluate employee(s) exposure to steel plate shot blasting, exposing employees to potential air borne contaminants.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3972

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2026
Abate by
Sep 2, 2026
Penalty
Initial $9,268 · Current $4,965 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  (a) On or about February 19, 2026, and dates prior, a written Energy Control Program (Lockout/Tagout) was not developed to ensure employee(s) who perform maintenance, repair and other associated mechanical diagnostic procedures on, but not limited to Blanchard rotary grinders,  dust collection units,  coolant filtration systems, CNC machines and other production equipment and processes,  were not exposed to unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4965
  • · Z (S) $9268

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2026
Abate by
Sep 2, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures are not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:   (a) On or about February 19, 2026, and days prior, written machine/equipment specific energy control procedures are not developed, documented, and utilized for authorized personnel to follow when performing maintenance or servicing work on machines/equipment including but not limited to the Blanchard rotary grinders,  dust collection units,  coolant filtration  systems, CNC machines and other production equipment and processes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2026
Abate by
Sep 2, 2026
Penalty
Initial $6,621 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):   (a) On or about February 19, 2026, and dates prior, the employer did not ensure all employees that operate powered industrial trucks in this facility had been trained and evaluated, and that certification was provided  to ensure competency of the employee(s) prior to operating the powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3500
  • · Z (S) $6621

1910.184 D

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2026
Abate by
Sep 2, 2026
Penalty
Initial $6,621 · Current $3,300 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.184(d): Inspections. Each day before being used, the sling and all fastenings and attachments were not inspected for damage or defects by a competent person designated by the employer. Additional inspections were not performed during sling use, where service conditions warrant. Damaged or defective slings were not immediately removed from service.   (a) On or about February 19, 2026, a damaged six (6) foot long synthetic web sling, that was cut/frayed in the middle of the sling was being used to handle  material  with an overhead crane located in the second crane bay near the shot blast booth.  The sling was not inspected prior to being placed into service, exposing employee(s) to  a struck by and crushing hazard.  (b) On or about February 19, 2026, a chain sling used to attach and lift the 11,000 pound capacity Magswitch magnet lifter with a damaged hook safety latch, was being used on a P&H 40 ton hoist crane in the third crane bay. The  chain sling and hook was not inspected prior to being placed into service, exposing employees to a struck by and crushing hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3300
  • · Z (S) $6621

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2026
Abate by
Sep 2, 2026
Penalty
Initial $3,972 · Current $0 Reduced
1910.1200(h)(1)  Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and safety data sheets.   (a) On or about February 19, 2026, the employer did not develop or maintain a written hazard communication program when employees worked with hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to Anticorit DFO 6101, Fuchs Eco Cool 785, Apex performance lube EP Gear Oil 220, cutting fluids  and Lincoln Electric Plateguard Conditioner.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $3972

1910.179 J01 II A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2026
Abate by
Aug 19, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.179(j)(1)(ii)(a): The employer did ensure frequent crane inspections at daily intervals were conducted.  (a) On or about February 19, 2026, and dates prior, the employer did not ensure that frequent inspections at daily  intervals of the overhead cranes used in this facility were conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.184 E02 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2026
Abate by
Sep 2, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.184(e)(2)(i): Hooks, rings, oblong links, pear shaped links, welded or mechanical coupling links or other attachments did not have a rated capacity at least equal to that of the alloy steel chain with which they were used or the sling was used in excess of the rated capacity of the weakest component.  (a) On or about February 19, 2026, in house fabricated plate hook attachments used to lift steel plate onto the burn tables by the machine operator had not been rated and marked before use with the attached chain sling. This exposed the employee(s) to a struck-by and crushing hazard.  (b) On or about February 19, 2026, makeshift lifting rings attached as a part of a chain sling and used to lift a 14 yard dumpster, had not been rated and marked for use with the attached chain sling. This exposed the employee  to a struck-by and crushing hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Sullivan Precision Plate, LLC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348758699.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.