Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MCNAIRN PACKAGING, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MCNAIRN PACKAGING, INC. in 6 ELISE ST., WESTFIELD, MA 01085 (NAICS 322121). OSHA activity number 348803495.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mcnairn Packaging, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mcnairn Packaging, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6 ELISE ST.
City
WESTFIELD
State
MA
ZIP
01085
Mailing
6 ELISE ST., WESTFIELD, MA 01085
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
322121
Employees
170
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2026
Abate by
Jun 4, 2026
Penalty
Initial $14,895 · Current $14,895
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  6 Elise St, Westfield, MA:  On and before March 12, 2026, the safety interlock system for the Sheeter 2 caged machinery area was inoperative, exposing operator employees who entered the area to hazardous machine operations without utilizing the written energy control procedures. On March 12, 2026, an employee who was repositioning stacks of paper inside the caged area received injuries when a leg became caught in the machine as the automated sliding tables started to move.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $14895
  • — Z (S) $14895

1910.147 C04 II B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2026
Abate by
Jun 4, 2026
Penalty
Initial $14,895 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy:  6 Elise St, Westfield, MA:  On and before March 12, 2026, employees were exposed to injury while performing servicing and maintenance activities on the Sheeter 2 machine as the energy control procedure did not clearly state the steps to control hazardous energy sources. Sections 2.4 and 2.6 differed as to the number of air lines to disconnect and the procedure was not specific as to whether one, two, or three locks were required to isolate the pneumatic sources.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $14895

1910.147 C04 II D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2026
Abate by
Jun 4, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures:  6 Elise St, Westfield, MA:  On and before March 12, 2026, the energy control procedure for the Sheeter 2 machine, allowed for potential hazardous energy exposure as it directed to perform servicing and maintenance tasks without including the verification steps that authorized employees must take to verify that the lockout devices had effectively isolated the potential electrical and pneumatic energy sources.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2026
Abate by
Jun 4, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(6)(i):  The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedures at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  6 Elise St, Westfield, MA:  On and before March 12, 2026, the employer had not performed a comprehensive periodic inspection of energy control procedures for all multi-energy source machines, at least annually, including the Sheeter 2  Machine, to verify that each procedure was adequate and being properly used by employees.  *Abatement Notes:  A periodic inspection shall include the following elements:  - Appointment of an authorized employee to inspect each local procedure for employee deviations and procedural inaccuracies during an energy control task - A review by inspector with each authorized employee, of that employee's responsibilities under each energy control procedure they are authorized to use - Certification that the periodic inspections have been performed by identifying the machines or equipment on which the energy control procedures were being utilized, the dates of the inspections, the employees included in the inspections, and the persons performing the inspections *Abatement notes are intended only to provide clarity regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies. Abatement notes do not create (or diminish) legal obligations under the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Mcnairn Packaging, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348803495.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.