MONROE, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: CAPASSO ENTERPRISES, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CAPASSO ENTERPRISES, INC. in ROUTE 111, MONROE, CT 06468 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 113209928.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CAPASSO ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Site address
- ROUTE 111
- City
- MONROE
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06468
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 205, OLD LYME, CT 06371
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (Y)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1542
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Construction safety.
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 24, 1992
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: The employees were exposed to a fall of 13 feet 6 inches from the roof area of the canopy to the ground. Jobsite: Employees were working on a roof of the service canopy , laborers were near the edge. Fall protection was not provided. (This item was abated during the inspection.) Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard include installing perimeter guardrails so as to prevent employees from falling over the edge.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 24, 1992
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to hazards resulting from riding on the loads carried by fork lift trucks: East Side: Employees were allowed to ride the load on the forks of the Lull Lift truck. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to prohibit employees from riding loads carried by lift trucks.
1926.59 E01
- Issued
- Jul 24, 1992
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 1992
1926.59 G01
- Issued
- Jul 24, 1992
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 1992
1926.59 H
- Issued
- Jul 24, 1992
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 1992
More inspections at Capasso Enterprises, INC.
View Capasso Enterprises, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 113209928.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.