GRAND JUNCTION, CO —
OSHA Inspection: LEITNER-POMA OF AMERICA, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LEITNER-POMA OF AMERICA, INC. in 2510 FORESIGHT CR., GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81505 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 116119405.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LEITNER-POMA OF AMERICA, INC.
- Site address
- 2510 FORESIGHT CR.
- City
- GRAND JUNCTION
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 81505
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3799
- Employees
- 80
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
20 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $3,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of a crane failure: a) Leitner-Poma of America, Inc. & 2510 Foresight Cr., Grand Junction, CO: On or before 6/18/02, the employer did not ensure that cranes exhibiting deficiencies which could compromise their safe function were removed from service, as required by ASME B30.5-1994, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers - An American National Standard - Safety Standard for Cableways, Cranes, Derricks, Hoists, Hooks, Jacks, and Slings - Mobile and Locomotive Cranes, paragraph 5- 2.3.2, until such deficiencies were repaired. The Grove RT60S (Serial# 19376) truck crane exhibited deficiencies such as, but not limited to, intermittently functioning gauges and anti-two blocking device, a sticking boom angle indicator, and cracked welds on the outriggers. Abatement Note: One feasible abatement method is to follow the requirements of ASME B30.5 and to remove the crane from service until the deficiencies are corrected. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement Certification Letter").tion
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3250.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,105 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing hazards from falling loads: a) Leitner-Poma of America, Inc. & 2510 Foresight Cr., Grand Junction, CO: On or before 6/18/02, the employer did not ensure that shop-made under-the-hook lifting devices were tested and rated in accordance with the requirements of ASME B30.20-1985, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers - An American National Standard - Safety Standard for Cableways, Cranes, Derricks, Hoists, Hooks, Jacks, and Slings - Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices. These deficiencies are as follows: 1. Job-made lifting devices such as the hanger tube lifting clamp in the Machine Shop and the sheave train lifting device in the Sheave Area were not marked as to their load rating, manufacturer, lifter weight, and serial numbers which are required by paragraphs 20-1.2.1 (a) and (b) of ASME B30.20-1985. 2. The lifting devices had not had an initial rated load test, using the attachment methods in place, as required by paragraph 20-1.4.2(a) of ASME B30.20-1985. Abatement Note: One feasible abatement method is to test and rate the hoists and lifting devices in accordance with ASME B30.20-1985. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (See enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1105.00
- — Z (S) $1700.00
1910.101 B
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,105 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1105.00
- — Z (S) $1700.00
1910.106 E02 IIB2
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $2,125 · Current $1,381 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1381.25
- — Z (S) $2125.00
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $2,125
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $2125.00
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2002
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.178 L
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $2,125 · Current $1,381 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1381.25
- — Z (S) $2125.00
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Jul 24, 2002
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.180 D05 II
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Jul 24, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $2,125
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $2125.00
1910.180 D06
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2002
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $1,275 · Current $829 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $828.75
- — Z (S) $1275.00
1910.243 C01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,934 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1933.75
- — Z (S) $2975.00
1910.253 A02
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Jul 24, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $2,125 · Current $1,381 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1381.25
- — Z (S) $2125.00
1910.303 B01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,105 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1105.00
- — Z (S) $1700.00
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2002
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.303 C
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Jul 24, 2002
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.303 F
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2002
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2002
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.305 B02
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2002
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.212 B
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2002
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2002
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Leitner-Poma of America, INC.
View Leitner-Poma of America, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 116119405.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.