Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PRINTPACK, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PRINTPACK, INC. in 3510 ASHEVILLE HIGHWAY, HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28791 (NAICS 326112). OSHA activity number 309675916.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Printpack, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Printpack, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PRINTPACK, INC.
Site address
3510 ASHEVILLE HIGHWAY
City
HENDERSONVILLE
State
NC
ZIP
28791
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326112
SIC code (legacy)
2671
Employees
162
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

7 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2006
Abate by
Mar 17, 2006
Penalty
Initial $688 · Current $688
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina:
The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of
employment and a place of employment
which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to
cause death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)  Facility  --  Slitter area  --  The CM series 635, 2-ton underhung
crane had not been load tested as
required.
Reference:ANSI B30.16-2, Section 16-2.2Testing, Paragraph 16-2.2.3 Load
Tests
(b)Electric Powered or Air Powered Hoists
(1)Complete new hoists shall be dynamically load tested by the
manufacturer as specified in paragraphs 16-2.2.1(b)(1) and (2) with a
load test not less than 125of the rated load, except that if testing
cannot be performed by the manufacturer, the user shall be notified and
the load test shall be accomplished at another location or job site, by or
under the direction of a designated person prior to the hoist being placed
into service.  (The user is testing the complete structure whether or not
the hoist was tested by the manufacturer.)
(c)The person conducting the load test shall prepare a written report of
the load
sustained during the test and the operations performed during the test.
Reports
must be placed on file.
NONE:  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct
this hazard is to load test
the underhung hoist as required and maintain a record of the load test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $688.00
  • — Z (S) $688.00

95012901

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2006
Abate by
Mar 17, 2006
North Carolina General Statute 95-0129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina:  The
employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment
and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)  Facility - slitter area  --  The rail of the CM 2-ton underhung hoist
did not have a posted rated load.
Reference:ANSI B30.11-98, Chapter 11-1, Section 11-1.1 Markings, Paragraph
11-.1.1.1 Rated
Load Markings - Crane.  The rated load of the crane shall be marked on the
crane and
if the crane had more than one hoisting unit, each hoist shall have its
rated load marked
on the hoist or its load block so that the rated load marking shall be
legible from the
ground or floor.  The combined load on all hoists on the crane shall not
exceed the rated
load of the crane.
NOTE:Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct
this hazard is to
properly mark the rated load on the components of the system.nts
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.184 I09 III

Serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2006
Abate by
Feb 24, 2006
Penalty
Initial $688 · Current $585 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $584.80
  • — Z (S) $688.00

1910.184 D

Serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2006
Abate by
Mar 17, 2006
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2006
Abate by
Mar 17, 2006

1910.36 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2006
Abate by
Feb 24, 2006

1910.303 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2006
Abate by
Mar 3, 2006

View Printpack, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 309675916.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.