HENDERSONVILLE, NC —
OSHA Inspection: PRINTPACK, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PRINTPACK, INC. in 3510 ASHEVILLE HIGHWAY, HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28791 (NAICS 326112). OSHA activity number 309675916.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PRINTPACK, INC.
- Site address
- 3510 ASHEVILLE HIGHWAY
- City
- HENDERSONVILLE
- State
- NC
- ZIP
- 28791
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326112
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2671
- Employees
- 162
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
95012901
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2006
- Abate by
- Mar 17, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $688 · Current $688
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a) Facility -- Slitter area -- The CM series 635, 2-ton underhung crane had not been load tested as required. Reference:ANSI B30.16-2, Section 16-2.2Testing, Paragraph 16-2.2.3 Load Tests (b)Electric Powered or Air Powered Hoists (1)Complete new hoists shall be dynamically load tested by the manufacturer as specified in paragraphs 16-2.2.1(b)(1) and (2) with a load test not less than 125of the rated load, except that if testing cannot be performed by the manufacturer, the user shall be notified and the load test shall be accomplished at another location or job site, by or under the direction of a designated person prior to the hoist being placed into service. (The user is testing the complete structure whether or not the hoist was tested by the manufacturer.) (c)The person conducting the load test shall prepare a written report of the load sustained during the test and the operations performed during the test. Reports must be placed on file. NONE: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to load test the underhung hoist as required and maintain a record of the load test.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $688.00
- — Z (S) $688.00
95012901
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2006
- Abate by
- Mar 17, 2006
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-0129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a) Facility - slitter area -- The rail of the CM 2-ton underhung hoist did not have a posted rated load. Reference:ANSI B30.11-98, Chapter 11-1, Section 11-1.1 Markings, Paragraph 11-.1.1.1 Rated Load Markings - Crane. The rated load of the crane shall be marked on the crane and if the crane had more than one hoisting unit, each hoist shall have its rated load marked on the hoist or its load block so that the rated load marking shall be legible from the ground or floor. The combined load on all hoists on the crane shall not exceed the rated load of the crane. NOTE:Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to properly mark the rated load on the components of the system.nts
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.184 I09 III
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2006
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $688 · Current $585 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $584.80
- — Z (S) $688.00
1910.184 D
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2006
- Abate by
- Mar 17, 2006
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.22 D01
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2006
- Abate by
- Mar 17, 2006
1910.36 D01
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2006
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2006
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2006
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2006
More inspections at Printpack, INC.
View Printpack, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326112)
More inspections in NC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 309675916.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.