HOUSTON, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: UNION TANK CAR CO.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of UNION TANK CAR CO. in 16923 OLD BEAUMONT HIGHWAY 90, HOUSTON, TX 77049 (NAICS 336510). OSHA activity number 310895214.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- UNION TANK CAR CO.
- Site address
- 16923 OLD BEAUMONT HIGHWAY 90
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77049
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336510
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3743
- Employees
- 550
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
27 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a)On or about April 11, 2007, employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck by the wire rope used on the car puller in Cell H should the wire rope break. The wire rope in use on the car puller was damaged, with approximately 40 individual broken wires, two areas of bird-caging, and severely abraded areas. Both of the directional sheaves were damaged, with one sheave cracked and separated such that the cracked and damaged lip of the sheave extended into the pulley groove. The damaged wire rope and sheaves exposed employees not protected by the operator's enclosure to struck by injuries should the wire rope fail under the 26,000-32,000 pound load while pulling tank cars into and out of the paint and blast booths on tracks 22 and 23. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to inspect wire rope as described in the Wire Rope User's Manual and Inspection Guidelines from the Wire Rope Technical Board, and remove wire rope from service when defects render the wire rope unsafe; inspect sheaves for damage and remove them from service when defects are found. Disclaimers: 1.You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2.The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3.The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate method of abatement. *** Certification and Documentation of Abatement Required ***
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2500.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of falling and injuries associated with swing falls. a)On or about April 4, 2007, and at times theretofore and thereafter, Cells B and C, employees were exposed to fall hazards and injuries from swing falls because the employer did not insure that the welding booms used as fall protection anchorage connectors were strong enough to support at least 5000 pounds. Bolted connections on welding boom bases were missing, and boom locks were damaged. b)On or about April 4, 2007, Horizontal lifelines used in Cells C and H were not evaluated in accordance with acceptable engineering practices to determine that the system would perform as intended, did not undergo qualification testing, and no calculations performed and certified by a qualified person could be provided. The wire rope clips used in the installation of the lifelines were malleable clips, not forged, and had no proof test. Two of three clips were installed backwards on the lifeline at Cell C. One formed eye at the horizontal lifeline at Cell C was formed without use of a thimble. One end of the wire rope was not seized, whipped or spliced and was unraveling. One acceptable method of abatement, among others, is to evaluate fall protection systems in accordance with ANSI Z359.1-1992 Section 3. Requirements, Section 4.Qualification Testing, Section 5. Marking and Instructions, Section 6. Inspection, Maintenance and Storage of Equipment, and Section 7. Equipment, Selection, Rigging, Use and Training. Disclaimers: 1.You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2.The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3.The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate method of abatement. *** Certification and Documentation of Abatement Required ***
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1250.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1250.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.37 B06
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
- · R (O)
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.37 B07
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2007
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (S)
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1250.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.146 D09
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1250.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.147 E01
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $2000.00
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.212 A05
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1250.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2007
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.219 C02 I
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2500.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.243 A02 II
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1250.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.252 B01 I
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1250.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.254 D09 III
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $750.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.303 C
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1250.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.305 A02 IIIG
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.305 D
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $2000.00
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $750.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.107 G02
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 23, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $12,500 · Current $2,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · R (S) $2500.00
- · Z (R) $12500.00
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $12,500 · Current $2,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2500.00
- · Z (R) $12500.00
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $12,500 · Current $2,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2500.00
- · Z (R) $12500.00
1910.146 D03 VI
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2007
Recent events (2)
- · R (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.176 F
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2007
Recent events (2)
- · R (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.305 A01 I
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2007
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
More inspections at Union Tank CAR CO.
View Union Tank CAR CO.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336510)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 310895214.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.