TIFFIN, OH —
OSHA Inspection: AMERIWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Follow-up inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a follow-up health inspection of AMERIWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC. in 458 SECOND AVE., TIFFIN, OH 44883 (NAICS 337122). OSHA activity number 311606883.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AMERIWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Site address
- 458 SECOND AVE.
- City
- TIFFIN
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44883
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Follow-up (F)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 337122
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2511
- Employees
- 310
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $3,250 Reduced
M102
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were exposed to wood dust explosions, deflagrations, or other fire hazards because methods were not utilized to ensure proper collection of and prevent ignition of combustible wood dust during the generation, handling, and collection operations: a.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio: On or about January 20, 2009, the employer did not ensure the Seneca dust collector, model # 400-T-10, located on the North side of the facility's courtyard, was provided with deflagration isolation devices to prevent deflagration propagation from the dust collector to the upstream work area. b.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio: On or about January 20, 2009, the employer did not ensure the Carter dust collector, model #376 RF-10, located on the South side of the facility's courtyard, was provided with deflagration isolation devices to prevent deflagration propagation from the dust collector to the upstream work area. c.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio: On or about January 20, 2009, the employer did not ensure the Torit dust collector, model #376 RFH-12, located on the West side of the facility, was provided with deflagration isolation devices to prevent deflagration propagation from the dust collector to the upstream and down stream work areas. d.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio: On or about January 20, 2009, the employer did not ensure the Torit dust collector, model #376 RF-8, located on the West side of the facility, was provided with deflagration isolation devices to prevent deflagration propagation from the dust collector to the upstream work area. e.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio: On or about January 20, 2009, the employer did not ensure the Dustkop SA Baghouse, model #FH 58-1DE-SP, located in the Edge Line department, was located outside of the building, had the blower fan down stream of the dust collector and was provided with deflagration isolation devices to prevent deflagration propagation from the dust collector to the upstream and down stream work areas. The Dustkp SA Baghouse, model #FH 58-1DE-SP, as installed, did not meet any of the exceptions listed in NFPA 664 8.2.2.5.1.4. f.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio: On or about January 20, 2009, the employer did not ensure the Dustkop SA Vacuum enclosureless dust collector, model #FT64-SP, located in the Laminator department, was located outside the building and was not permitted to recycle air back into the facility without being equipped with a fire supression system. g.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio: On or about January 20, 2009, the employer did not ensure the storage silo baghouse, located on the South side of thefacility's courtyard, was equipped with deflagration isolation devices to prevent deflagration propagation from the dust collector to the upstream storage silo. h.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio: On or about January 20, 2009, the employer did not ensure the Donaldson dust collector, model #376 RFH-12, located on the South side of the facility, was equipped with a deflagration isolation device to prevent deflagration propagation from the dust collector to the upstream work areas. Abatement Note: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to comply with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 664 "Prevention of Fires and Explosions in Wood Processing and Woodworking Facilities" (2007), including, but not limited to: a) Install a deflagration detection and suppression system in accordance with Chapter 8 of NFPA 664. b) Locate fans on the clean air side of dust collectors in accordance with Chapter 8 of NFPA 664. c) Locate dust collectors outside of buildings according to Chapter 8 of NFPA 664. d) Install fire suppression equipment in dust collectors in accordance with chapter 8 of NFPA 664. Abatement Schedule Step 1-A written detailed plan of abatement shall be submitted to the Area Director outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering controls, instrumentation, and equipment to protect employees from fire and deflagration hazards related to combustible dust as referenced in this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation: (1)Evaluation of engineering control options; (2)Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design; and (3)Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures; All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use by a person competent in fire and deflagration control of combustible dusts. At the conclusion of the 60-day period, the detailed plan for abatement shall be submitted to the area director. Step 2-Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchaseor repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.t,
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3250.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.147 C08
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1625.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1300.00
- — Z (S) $2000.00
1910.333 B02
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1300.00
- — Z (S) $2000.00
1910.333 B02 IVB
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1300.00
- — Z (S) $2000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $25,000 · Current $16,250 Reduced
M102
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were exposed to wood dust explosions, deflagrations, or other fire hazards because methods were not utilized to ensure proper collection of and prevent ignition of combustible wood dust during the generation, handling, and collection operations: a.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio: On or about January 20, 2009, the employer did not ensure the Seneca dust collector, model # 400-T-10, located on the North side of the facility's courtyard, was equipped with spark detection and suppression equipment in the duct work upstream of the collector. b.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio: On or about January 20, 2009, the employer did not ensure the Carter dust collector, model #376 RF-10, located on the South side of the facility's courtyard, was equipped with spark detection and suppression equipment in the duct work upstream of the collector. c.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio: On or about January 20, 2009, the employer did not ensure the Torit dust collector, model #376 RFH-12, located on the West side of the facility, was equipped with spark detection and suppression equipment in the duct work upstream of the collector. d.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio: On or about January 20, 2009, the employer did not ensure the Torit dust collector, model #376 RF-8, located on the West side of the facility, was equipped with spark detection and suppression equipment in the duct work upstream of the collector. e.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio: On or about January 20, 2009, the employer did not ensure the Dustkop SA Baghouse, model #FH 58-1DE-SP, located in the Edge Line department, was equipped with spark detection and suppression equipment in the duct work upstream of the collector. f.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio: On or about January 20, 2009, the employer did not ensure the Dustkop SA Vacuum enclosureless dust collector, model #FT64-SP, located in the Laminator department, was equipped with spark detection and suppression equipment in the duct work upstream of the collector. This employer has received a citation for this standard or a substantially similar standard as reflected in inspection #311603179, citation #1, item #1, issued on August 11, 2008 and became a final order on September 2, 2008. Abatement Note: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to comply with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 664 "Prevention of Fires and Explosions in Wood Processing and Woodworking Facilities" (2007),including, but not limited to installing a spark detection and suppression systems in accordance with Chapter 8 of NFPA 664. Abatement Schedule Step 1-A written detailed plan of abatement shall be submitted to the Area Director outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering controls, instrumentation, and equipment to protect employees from fire and deflagration hazards related to combustible dust as referenced in this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation: (1)Evaluation of engineering control options; (2)Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design; and (3)Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures; All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use by a person competent in fire and deflagration control of combustible dusts. At the conclusion of the 60-day period, the detailed plan for abatement shall be submitted to the area director. Step 2-Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $16250.00
- — Z (R) $25000.00
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $35,000 · Current $22,750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $22750.00
- — Z (R) $35000.00
1910.145 C03
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $200 · Current $200
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $200.00
- — Z (R) $200.00
1910.147 D03
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $12,500 · Current $8,125 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $8125.00
- — Z (R) $12500.00
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (R)
- — Z (R)
1910.147 D06
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $10,000 · Current $6,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $6500.00
- — Z (R) $10000.00
1910.307 C02 I
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $12,500 · Current $8,125 Reduced
E101
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $8125.00
- — Z (R) $12500.00
1910.178 A06
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Ameriwood Industries, INC.
View Ameriwood Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 337122)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311606883.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.