Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AMERIWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC.

Follow-up inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a follow-up health inspection of AMERIWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC. in 458 SECOND AVE., TIFFIN, OH 44883 (NAICS 337122). OSHA activity number 311606883.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ameriwood Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ameriwood Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
458 SECOND AVE.
City
TIFFIN
State
OH
ZIP
44883
Inspection type
Follow-up (F)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337122
SIC code (legacy)
2511
Employees
310
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 8 instances 90 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2009
Abate by
Oct 11, 2009
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,250 Reduced

Hazardous substances M102

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees, in that employees
were exposed to wood dust explosions, deflagrations, or other fire hazards
because methods
were not utilized to ensure proper collection of and prevent ignition of
combustible wood dust
during the generation, handling, and collection operations:
a.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio:  On or about January
20, 2009, the
employer did not ensure the Seneca dust collector, model # 400-T-10,
located on the
North side of the facility's courtyard, was provided with deflagration
isolation devices
to prevent deflagration propagation from the dust collector to the
upstream work area.
b.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio:  On or about January
20,
2009, the
employer did not ensure the Carter dust collector, model #376 RF-10,
located on the
South side of the facility's courtyard, was provided with deflagration
isolation devices
to prevent deflagration propagation from the dust collector to the
upstream work area.
c.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio:  On or about January
20, 2009, the
employer did not ensure the Torit dust collector, model #376 RFH-12,
located on the
West side of the facility, was provided with deflagration isolation
devices to prevent
deflagration propagation from the dust collector to the upstream and down
stream work
areas.
d.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio:  On or about January
20, 2009, the
employer did not ensure the Torit dust collector, model #376 RF-8, located
on the West
side of the facility, was provided with deflagration isolation devices to
prevent
deflagration propagation from the dust collector to the upstream work area.
e.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio:  On or about January
20, 2009, the
employer did not ensure the Dustkop SA Baghouse, model #FH 58-1DE-SP,
located in
the Edge Line department, was located outside of the building, had the
blower fan down
stream of the dust collector and was provided with deflagration isolation
devices to
prevent deflagration propagation from the dust collector to the upstream
and down stream
work areas. The Dustkp SA Baghouse, model #FH 58-1DE-SP, as installed, did
not meet
any of the exceptions listed in NFPA 664 8.2.2.5.1.4.
f.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio:  On or about January
20, 2009, the
employer did not ensure the Dustkop SA Vacuum enclosureless dust
collector, model
#FT64-SP, located in the Laminator department, was located outside the
building and
was not permitted to recycle air back into the facility without being
equipped with a fire
supression system.
g.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio:  On or about January
20, 2009, the
employer did not ensure the storage silo baghouse, located on the South
side of thefacility's courtyard, was equipped with deflagration isolation
devices to prevent
deflagration propagation from the dust collector to the upstream storage
silo.
h.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio:  On or about January
20, 2009, the
employer did not ensure the Donaldson dust collector, model #376 RFH-12,
located on
the South side of the facility, was equipped with a deflagration isolation
device to prevent
deflagration propagation from the dust collector to the upstream work
areas.
Abatement Note: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement
method
to
correct this hazard is to comply with National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA) 664
"Prevention of Fires and Explosions in Wood Processing and Woodworking
Facilities" (2007),
including, but not limited to: a) Install a deflagration detection and
suppression system in
accordance with Chapter 8 of NFPA 664. b) Locate fans on the clean air
side of dust collectors
in accordance with Chapter 8 of NFPA 664. c) Locate dust collectors
outside of buildings
according to Chapter 8 of NFPA 664. d) Install fire suppression equipment
in dust collectors in
accordance with chapter 8 of NFPA 664.
Abatement Schedule
Step 1-A written detailed plan of abatement shall be submitted to the Area
Director
outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering controls,
instrumentation, and equipment to protect employees from fire and
deflagration
hazards related to combustible dust as referenced in this citation.  This
plan
shall
include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be
consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation:
(1)Evaluation of engineering control options;
(2)Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design; and
(3)Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures;
All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use by
a
person competent in fire and deflagration control of combustible dusts.
At the
conclusion of the 60-day period, the detailed plan for abatement shall be
submitted to the area director.
Step 2-Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of
feasible
engineering controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving
compliance.
In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required
for
this violation
(using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition,
documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included
with your
certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to,
evidence of the purchaseor repair of the equipment, photographic or video
evidence of abatement, or other written
records.t,
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3250.00
  • — Z (S) $5000.00

1910.147 C08

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2009
Abate by
Jul 21, 2009
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $1,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1625.00
  • — Z (S) $2500.00

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2009
Abate by
Aug 11, 2009
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300.00
  • — Z (S) $2000.00

1910.333 B02

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2009
Abate by
Jul 21, 2009
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300.00
  • — Z (S) $2000.00

1910.333 B02 IVB

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2009
Abate by
Jul 21, 2009
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2009
Abate by
Jul 28, 2009
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300.00
  • — Z (S) $2000.00

5(a)(1)

Repeat Gravity 10 6 instances 90 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2009
Abate by
Aug 11, 2009
Penalty
Initial $25,000 · Current $16,250 Reduced

Hazardous substances M102

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees, in that employees
were exposed to wood dust explosions, deflagrations, or other fire hazards
because methods
were not utilized to ensure proper collection of and prevent ignition of
combustible wood dust
during the generation, handling, and collection operations:
a.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio:  On or about January
20, 2009, the
employer did not ensure the Seneca dust collector, model # 400-T-10,
located on the
North side of the facility's courtyard, was equipped with spark detection
and suppression
equipment in the duct work upstream of the collector.
b.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio:  On or about January
20, 2009, the
employer did not ensure the Carter dust collector, model #376 RF-10,
located on the
South side of the facility's courtyard, was equipped with spark detection
and suppression
equipment in the duct work upstream of the collector.
c.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio:  On or about January
20, 2009, the
employer did not ensure the Torit dust collector, model #376 RFH-12,
located on the
West side of the facility, was equipped with spark detection and
suppression equipment
in the duct work upstream of the collector.
d.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio:  On or about January
20, 2009, the
employer did not ensure the Torit dust collector, model #376 RF-8, located
on the West
side of the facility, was equipped with spark detection and suppression
equipment in the
duct work upstream of the collector.
e.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio:  On or about January
20,
2009, the
employer did not ensure the Dustkop SA Baghouse, model #FH 58-1DE-SP,
located in
the Edge Line department, was equipped with spark detection and
suppression equipment
in the duct work upstream of the collector.
f.Ameriwood Industries, Inc. located in Tiffin, Ohio:  On or about January
20, 2009, the
employer did not ensure the Dustkop SA Vacuum enclosureless dust
collector, model
#FT64-SP, located in the Laminator department, was equipped with spark
detection and
suppression equipment in the duct work upstream of the collector.
This employer has received a citation for this standard or a substantially
similar standard as
reflected in inspection #311603179, citation #1, item #1, issued on August
11, 2008 and became
a final order on September 2, 2008.
Abatement Note: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement
method to
correct this hazard is to comply with National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA) 664
"Prevention of Fires and Explosions in Wood Processing and Woodworking
Facilities" (2007),including, but not limited to installing a spark
detection and suppression systems in accordance
with Chapter 8 of NFPA 664.
Abatement Schedule
Step 1-A written detailed plan of abatement shall be submitted to the Area
Director
outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering controls,
instrumentation, and equipment to protect employees from fire and
deflagration
hazards related to combustible dust as referenced in this citation.  This
plan shall
include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be
consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation:
(1)Evaluation of engineering control options;
(2)Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design; and
(3)Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures;
All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use by
a
person competent in fire and deflagration control of combustible dusts.
At the
conclusion of the 60-day period, the detailed plan for abatement shall be
submitted to the area director.
Step 2-Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of
feasible
engineering controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving
compliance.
In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required
for this violation
(using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition,
documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included
with your
certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to,
evidence of the purchase
or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement,
or other written
records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $16250.00
  • — Z (R) $25000.00

1910.22 A01

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2009
Abate by
Jul 21, 2009
Penalty
Initial $35,000 · Current $22,750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $22750.00
  • — Z (R) $35000.00

1910.145 C03

Repeat Gravity 01 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2009
Abate by
Jul 21, 2009
Penalty
Initial $200 · Current $200
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $200.00
  • — Z (R) $200.00

1910.147 D03

Repeat Gravity 03 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2009
Abate by
Jul 28, 2009
Penalty
Initial $12,500 · Current $8,125 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $8125.00
  • — Z (R) $12500.00

1910.147 D04 I

Repeat Gravity 03 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2009
Abate by
Jul 28, 2009
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R)
  • — Z (R)

1910.147 D06

Repeat Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2009
Abate by
Jul 21, 2009
Penalty
Initial $10,000 · Current $6,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $6500.00
  • — Z (R) $10000.00

1910.307 C02 I

Repeat Gravity 03 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2009
Abate by
Jul 28, 2009
Penalty
Initial $12,500 · Current $8,125 Reduced

Hazardous substances E101

Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $8125.00
  • — Z (R) $12500.00

1910.178 A06

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2009
Abate by
Jul 21, 2009
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

View Ameriwood Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311606883.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.