WARWICK, RI —
OSHA Inspection: A T WALL COMPANY
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of A T WALL COMPANY in 55 SERVICE AVE, WARWICK, RI 02886 (NAICS 331421). OSHA activity number 314917840.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch A T Wall Company — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A T Wall Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- A T WALL COMPANY
- Site address
- 55 SERVICE AVE
- City
- WARWICK
- State
- RI
- ZIP
- 02886
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331421
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3351
- Employees
- 65
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
17 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 D03 IA
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $4,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(A): Process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include the materials of construction: Establishment: The process safety information maintained by the employer did not include the materials of construction on each piece of equipment that was part of the covered process.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4000.00
- — Z (S) $4000.00
1910.119 D03 IC
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2011
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(C): Process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include the electrical classification: Establishment: The process safety information maintained by the employer did not include the electrical equipment installed on and around the covered process.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.119 D03 ID
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2011
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(D): Process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include the relief system design and design basis: Establishment: The process safety information maintained by the employer did not include the relief system design or the design basis.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.119 E05
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5): The employer did not establish a system to assure that the process hazard analysis team's recommendations are resolved in a timely manner and that the resolution is documented: Establishment: The employer did not ensure that recommendations addressed by the PHA Team were resolved in a timely manner.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S) $3000.00
1910.119 F01 ID
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i)(D): The employer's written operating procedures covering the steps for each operating phase did not address emergency shutdown including the conditions under which emergency shutdown is required, and the assignment of shutdown responsibility to qualified operators to ensure that emergency shutdown is executed in a safe and timely manner: Establishment: The company's written operating procedures did not cover the steps which are to be followed during an emergency shutdown.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S) $4000.00
1910.119 F01 IG
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2011
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i)(G): The employer's written operating procedures covering the steps for each operating phase did not address startup following a turnaround, or after an emergency shutdown: Establishment: The company's written operating procedures did not cover the steps which needed to be followed during a startup after a turnaround or an emergency shutdown.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S)
1910.119 F03
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2011
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(3): The employer did not certify annually that the operating procedures are current and accurate: Establishment: The employer did not certify, at least annually, that the operating procedures had been reviewed and accurate.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S)
1910.119 J02
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish and implement written procedures to maintain the on-going mechanical integrity of process equipment: Establishment: The employer did not establish or implement written procedures on how to maintain the mechanical integrity of the equipment associated with the covered process.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.119 O01
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(o)(1): The employer did not certify that they had evaluated compliance with the provisions of 29 CFR 1910.119 at least every three years to verify that the procedures and practices developed under this standard were adequate and are being followed: Establishment: The employer did not certify that a compliance audit had been conducted at least once every three years on the covered process.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S) $3000.00
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in the paragraph (l): Establishment: The employer did not provide employees who operate the forklift with initial operator training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000.00
- — Z (S) $4000.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $4,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts: Tool Room: The rotating notched chuck on the Rice Machinery TI-1442 Horizontal Lathe Machine was not provided with safeguarding to prevent unintentional contact.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4000.00
- — Z (S) $4000.00
1910.215 A02
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections: Tool Room: The Norton Abrasive Wheel on surface grinder TR 1424 was not guarded and the spindle end, nut, and flange projections were exposed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S) $4000.00
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with, and/or did not use, electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed: Establishment: Personal protective equipment such as, but not limited to, voltage rated gloves, FR clothing, rated face shields, balaclavas, hard hats, and hearing protection were not provided to employees who verified that electrical equipment was properly de-energized.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000.00
- — Z (S) $4000.00
1904.10 A
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2011
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.10(a): The case was not recorded on the OSHA 300 Log when an employee's audiogram showed that the employee had experienced a work-related Standard Threshold Shift (STS) in hearing in one or both ears, and the employee's total hearing level was 25 decibels (dB) or more above the audiometric zero (averaged at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz) in the same ear(s) as the STS: Establishment: In the following instances, the employer did not ensure that employees who experienced work-related Standard Threshold Shifts were recorded on the OSHA 300 Log and 300A Summary Form; A. On or about April 12, 2011, two employees who each experienced a STS in one ear were not recorded on the 2011 OSHA 300/300A Log. B. On or about April 26, 2010, one employee who experienced a STS in one ear was not recorded on the 2010 OSHA 300/300A Log.300A
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2011
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A summary form of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300A or equivalent), was not completed in the detail required by the regulation. Establishment: On or about June 21, 2011, the OSHA 300 Log for the years 2010 and 2011 did not provide a specific description of recordable injuries and illnesses. The information provided for Column F for each of the following five entries was incomplete in that it did not describe the object or the substance that directly injured or made the employee ill: 2010 OSHA 300 Log: A. On or about May 25, Factory - an employee injury was logged as "finger". B. On or about August 12, Factory - an employee injury was logged as "groin pull". C. On or about October 5, Factory - an employee injury was logged as "lower back". D. On or about December 16, Factory - an employee injury was logged as "knee". 2011 OSHA 300 Log: E. On or about April 29, Shipping - an employee injury was logged as "hurt wrist".
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1904.32 A02
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2011
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(2): The employer did not create an annual summary of injuries and illnesses recorded on the OSHA 300 log: Establishment: On or about June 21, 2011, the OSHA 300A Summary for the year 2010 were not available upon request.e
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.119 C01
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2011
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(c)(1): The employer did not develop a written plan of action regarding the implementation of the employee participation required by 29 CFR 1910.119: Establishment: The employer did not develop a written plan of action regarding employee participation in the Process Safety Management Program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at A T Wall Company
Dec 21, 2023
WARWICK, RI
Dec 4, 2017
WARWICK, RI
Jul 24, 2013
WARWICK, RI
Jan 23, 2008
WARWICK, RI
Oct 28, 2003
WARWICK, RI
View A T Wall Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331421)
Feb 25, 2026
160598 - Wieland Copper Products, LLC · PINE HALL, NC
Sep 2, 2025
159591 - IMC - Metalsamerica, LLC · SHELBY, NC
Sep 20, 2024
67416 - Libertas Copper LLC DBA Hussey Fabricated Products · EMINENCE, KY
Feb 15, 2024
156017 - IMC - Metalsamerica, LLC · SHELBY, NC
Nov 4, 2022
65614 - the Okonite Company INC · RICHMOND, KY
More inspections in RI
Jul 16, 2026
Pease & Curren Incorporated · WARWICK, RI
Jul 16, 2026
International Packaging Corporation · PAWTUCKET, RI
Jul 16, 2026
Lyon Property Management, LLC · WARWICK, RI
Jul 14, 2026
Tforce Freight · LINCOLN, RI
Jul 14, 2026
West BAY Residential Services INC. · JOHNSTON, RI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 314917840.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.