Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CAI CUSTOM ALLOYS INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CAI CUSTOM ALLOYS INC. in 6871 BELFORD INDUSTRIAL DR., BELVIDERE, IL 61008 (NAICS 333518). OSHA activity number 330920828.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch CAI Custom Alloys INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for CAI Custom Alloys INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6871 BELFORD INDUSTRIAL DR.
City
BELVIDERE
State
IL
ZIP
61008
Mailing
6871 BELFORD INDUSTRIAL DR., BELVIDERE, IL 61008
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
Yes
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333518
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Abate by
Nov 30, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):     The employer did not ensure that a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures was established and implemented to include the provisions of (i)-(ix), as applicable    The employer did not develop and implement a respiratory protection program for the employees that are required to half mask respirators.    Abatement documentation is required for this item in acordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1800

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Abate by
Oct 24, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):     The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    The employer required the employees to wear a half mask respirator prior to providing a medical evaluation.    Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Abate by
Oct 24, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):     The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter    The employer required the employees to wear a half mask respirator without being fit tested to ensure the correct size for protection.    Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii):     Point of operation guards were not designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of their body in the danger zone during the operating cycle:    An employee received an amputation due to inadequate guarding of the point of operation on the large 350 shear.    Abatement documentation is not required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $4200

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4):     Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work:    The employees were required to use the DeWalt 756 bench grinder without a work rest installed.    No documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):     Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel:    The DeWalt 756 bench grinder did not have a tongue guard installed.    No abatement documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 8 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Abate by
Nov 30, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,800
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):     The employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program for employees that are required to work with chemicals such as, but not limited to, propane, welding, and plasma cutting fumes.    Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $1800

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Abate by
Oct 24, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    The employees working with chemicals such as, but not limited to propane, welding, and plasma fumes were not trained on their hazards.    Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirement of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1800

View CAI Custom Alloys INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330920828.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.