Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: CEMEX

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CEMEX in 3301 PORT ROAD EAST/ WEST, MOUNT VERNON, IN 47620 (NAICS 483211). OSHA activity number 330922683.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cemex for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cemex is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CEMEX
Site address
3301 PORT ROAD EAST/ WEST
City
MOUNT VERNON
State
IN
ZIP
47620
Mailing
3301 PORT ROAD EAST/ WEST, MOUNT VERNON, IN 47620
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
483211
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 G02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2011
Abate by
Dec 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,295 · Current $2,295
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program:    (a) At the Facility - Under 1918.97, the employer is required to have employees trained in first aid at this location.  The employees had not received training about bloodborne pathogens or their exposure control plan.  This deficiency was noted on or about June 1, 2011.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2295
  • · Z (S) $2295

1917.50 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2011
Abate by
Dec 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,925 Reduced
29 CFR 1917.50(a):     The employer used a material handling device listed in 29 CFR 1917.50(c) before ascertaining that the device had been certificated, as evidenced by current and valid documents attesting to compliance with the requirements in 29 CFR 1917.50(b).    (a) At the Dock - The Helia Crane HLRM 65-6S and the gear used by this crane to lift the the Bobcat into the barge were not inspected and certified as required.  This deficienciy was noted on or about June 1, 2011.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2925
  • · Z (S) $4500

1917.112 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2011
Abate by
Dec 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1917.112(a)(1):     Vehicle curbs or bull rails installed after October 3, 1983, were not at least 10 inches in height.    (a)  At the Dock - A bobcat was stored in a shed.  This bobcat was driven out of the shed to the edge of the dock to be lifted into a barge.  No curbs were present to prevent the vehicle from going over the edge.  This deficiency was noted on or about June 1, 2011.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $6300

1917.112 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2011
Abate by
Dec 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $4,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1917.112(b)(1):     Guardrails were not provided at locations where employees were exposed to floor or wall openings or waterside edges, including bridges or gangway-like structures leading to pilings or vessel mooring or berthing installations, which presented a hazard of falling more than 4 feet or into the water.    (a)  At the Dock - The floating has a entry hole in the floor of the dock which allows employees to get inside its interior.  The hatch is kept off.  No guardrails or other protective means are present to prevent employees from stepping into the opening.  This deficiency was noted on or about June 1, 201l.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4100
  • · Z (S) $6300

1918.26 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2011
Abate by
Dec 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,590 · Current $2,990 Reduced
29 CFR 1918.26(b):     When a ramp or walkway could not be used, the employer did not provide a straight ladder meeting the requirements of 29 CFR 1918.24 and extending at least 3 feet (.91 m) above the upper landing surface and adequately secured or held against shifting or slipping.    (a)  Between the Barge and the Dock - It was learned from employees that the barge was being accessed using a four feet high step ladder which was placed on the gunwale of the barge.  The step ladder was one foot lower than the dock, and it was not designed to be used as a means to safely climb from the dock to the gunwale.  Employees also stated they would jump across to the barge.  This deficiency was noted on or about June 1, 2011.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2990
  • · Z (S) $4590

1918.62 B03 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2011
Abate by
Dec 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,590 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1918.62(b)(3)(iv):     Wire rope was present which exhibited excessive wear or corrosion, deformation or other defect in the wire or attachments, including cracks in attachments:    (a)  On the Dock - Winches were being used to pull in, secure, and move the barge.  The rope was found to be corroded.  This deficiency was noted on or about June 1, 2011.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4590

1918.97 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2011
Abate by
Dec 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,490 Reduced
29 CFR 1918.97(b):     At least one person holding a valid first aid certificate, such as is issued by the Red Cross or other equivalent organization, was not available to render first aid when work was in progress.    (a) Throughout the Facility - An adequate number of personnel are not present who hold first aid certificates.  The only valid first aid certificate was held by a part time employee.  This employee's CPR had expired.  This deficiency was noted on or about June 1, 2011.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2490
  • · Z (S) $3825

View Cemex's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 330922683.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.