PICKERINGTON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: FRANCISCO PEREZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FRANCISCO PEREZ in 244 FOXGLEN DRIVE EAST, PICKERINGTON, OH 43147 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 330926320.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FRANCISCO PEREZ
- Site address
- 244 FOXGLEN DRIVE EAST
- City
- PICKERINGTON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43147
- Mailing
- 5407 ASHBURY VILLAGE COURT, COLUMBUS, OH 43228
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $2,550
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): \r\n\r\n\"Residential construction.\" Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.\r\n\r\n\r\na. At the worksite, the employer did not ensure/enforce that employee(s) used any means of fall protection while working at heights greater than six feet, installing sheathing, thereby exposing employee(s) to an approximate 13 foot fall hazard. b. At the worksite, the employer did not ensure/enforce that employee(s) not working near and/or around wall opening without adequate guarding, when located at heights greater than six feet, thereby exposing employees to an approximate 15 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2550
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,040 · Current $2,040
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. At the worksite where framing work was being performed, the employer did not ensure/enforce that safe access/exiting had been provided for employee(s) installing sheathing, there-by exposing employees to a potential trip/fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2040
More inspections at Francisco Perez
View Francisco Perez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330926320.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.