CHICAGO, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: BRIDGFORD FOOD PROCESSING CORPORATION
Follow-up inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a follow-up health inspection of BRIDGFORD FOOD PROCESSING CORPORATION in 170 N. GREEN STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60607 (NAICS 311612). OSHA activity number 331071076.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BRIDGFORD FOOD PROCESSING CORPORATION
- Site address
- 170 N. GREEN STREET
- City
- CHICAGO
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60607
- Mailing
- 170 N. GREEN STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60607
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Follow-up (F)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311612
- Employees
- 156
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.120 Q01
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Abate by
- May 9, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(1): The employer did not develop and implement an emergency response plan to handle anticipated emergencies prior to commencement of emergency response operations: a. On or about October 18, 2011, in the facility, the employer did not develop and implement an emergency response plan to respond to and handle anticipated emergencies. Employees are required to handle emergency response operations due to hazardous substance releases of anhydrous ammonia. Employees are potentially exposed to inhalation, fire and dermal hazards from anhydrous ammonia.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $7000
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.120 Q06 I
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Abate by
- May 9, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(i): First responders at the awareness level did not have sufficient training or have sufficient experience to objectively demonstrate competency in the areas covered by 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(i)(A) through (q)(6)(i)(F): a. On or about October 18, 2011, in the facility, employees who were required to respond to anhydrous ammonia releases at the awareness level did not have adequate training or sufficient experience to demonstrate competency.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $7000
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.120 Q08 I
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Abate by
- May 9, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $5,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(8)(i): Employees who were trained in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6) did not receive annual refresher training of sufficient content and duration to maintain their competencies or did not demonstrate competency in those areas at least yearly: a. On or about October 18, 2011, in the facility, employees who were required to respond to anhydrous ammonia releases at the hazardous materials technician level in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6) had not received annual refresher training to maintain their competencies. Two employees of the Emergency Response Team did not have annual refresher training since the initial 24 Hour Hazardous Material Technician training on July 7-9, 2008.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5500
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $5,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): a. On or about October 18, 2011, employees were exposed to eye and skin hazards during ammonia refrigeration maintenance and/or servicing operations and ammonia release responses. The employer did not perform a workplace hazard assessment, select and have each affected employee use PPE, communicate selection decisions to each affected employee, train each affected employee and verify that the required hazard assessment was performed.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5500
- · C (S) $5500
- · Z (S) $5500
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,300 · Current $5,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested: a. On or about October 18, 2011, in the facility, employee(s) were required to wear 6 MSA Gas Mask full-face respirators with canisters and 1 MSA Advantage 4001 air-purifying full face respirator during ammonia equipment maintenance and/or ammonia release responses. Employees required to wear tight-fitting respirators had not been fit tested.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5500
- · C (S) $3300
- · Z (S) $3300
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: a. On or about October 18, 2011, in the facility, employee(s) were required to wear 6 MSA Gas Mask full-face respirators with canisters and 1 MSA Advantage 4001 air-purifying full face respirator during ammonia equipment maintenance and/or ammonia release responses. Employees required to wear tight-fitting respirators had not received respirator training since January 2008.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $3300
- · Z (S) $3300
1910.307 C
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $6,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.307(c): Equipment, wiring methods, and installations of equipment in hazardous (classified) locations were not intrinsically safe, approved for the hazardous (classified) location, or safe for the hazardous (classified) location: a. On or about January 4, 2012, in the basement of 171 N. Green St., Chicago, IL 60607, in the varnish area(s) and the spray area(s), employees required to perform electrical & building maintenance adjacent to flammable liquid application operations were exposed to fire and/or smoke hazards associated with flammable liquids. Electrical equipment, including outlets, switches, lights and fans were not intrinsically safe, approved for Class 1 Division 2 hazardous (classified) location or safe for the Class 1, Division 2 hazardous (classified) location.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $6600
- · Z (S) $6600
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $16,500 · Current $1,770 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a. On or about September 29, 2011, near the Elevator 7, in the water treatment/ pit area, employees regularly worked with corrosive chemicals such as sodium hypochlorite 12.5%. Yet, an eyewash was not provided in the water treatment area for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes. b. On or about October 18, 2011, in the Compressor Room #2 area, employees regularly worked with corrosive chemicals such as anhydrous ammonia. Yet, an eyewash was not provided in the compressor room #2 area for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes. The Bridgford Food Processing Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.151(c), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 311369631, citation number 2, item number 6 and was affirmed as a final order on January 16, 2008, with respect to a workplace located at 170 N. Green St., Chicago, IL 60607.
Recent events (3)
- · F (R) $1770
- · C (R) $16500
- · Z (R) $16500
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $550 · Current $1,270
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: a. On or about February 2, 2012, in Compressor Room #2, an anhydrous ammonia accumulator vessel and associated ammonia process equipment in compressor room #2 were not labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical contained therein. The Bridgford Food Processing Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 313936288, citation number 2, item number 3 and was affirmed as a final order on September 30, 2010, with respect to a workplace located at 170 N. Green St., Chicago, IL 60607. The Bridgford Food Processing Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 311371249, citation number 2, item number 1a and was affirmed as a final order on June 25, 2008, with respect to a workplace located at 170 N. Green St., Chicago, IL 60607.
Recent events (3)
- · F (R) $1270
- · C (R) $550
- · Z (R) $550
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $550 · Current $1,270
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: a. On or about September 30, 2011, in the Packaging Area of the Carnation Room on the second floor, a plastic tray containing deep tool sanitizer Multiquat No. 455 solution containing alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride, octyl decyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, & ethyl alcohol was not labeled, tagged or marked with the hazard warning of the chemical contained therein. b. On or about February 2, 2012, in Compressor Room #2, an anhydrous ammonia accumulator vessel and associated ammonia process equipment in compressor room #2 were not labeled, tagged or marked with the hazard warning of the chemical contained therein. The Bridgford Food Processing Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 313936288, citation number 2, item number 4 and was affirmed as a final order on September 30, 2010, with respect to a workplace located at 170 N. Green St., Chicago, IL 60607. The Bridgford Food Processing Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 311371249, citation number 2, item number 1a and was affirmed as a final order on June 25, 2008, with respect to a workplace located at 170 N. Green St., Chicago, IL 60607.
Recent events (3)
- · F (R) $1270
- · C (R) $550
- · Z (R) $550
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: a. On or about September 29, 2011, in the facility, material safety data sheets were not maintained for each hazardous chemical in the workplace including HYPO 150 sodium hypochlorite 12.5%.
Recent events (3)
- · F (O) $0
- · C (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Bridgford Food Processing Corporation
View Bridgford Food Processing Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311612)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331071076.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.