TAMUNING, GU —
OSHA Inspection: EUREKA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EUREKA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION in SUNFLOWER PLAZA RETAINING WALL PROJECT TUMON, TAMUNING, GU 96913 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 331083238.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EUREKA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
- Site address
- SUNFLOWER PLAZA RETAINING WALL PROJECT TUMON
- City
- TAMUNING
- State
- GU
- ZIP
- 96913
- Mailing
- 114 CHATO COURT, SINAJANA, GU 96910
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238110
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.452 A03
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,040 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(a)(3): Diagonal bracing in both directions was not installed across the entire inside face of double-pole scaffolds used to support loads equivalent to a uniformly distributed load of 50 pounds (222 kg) or more per square foot (929 square cm): (a) At the project on or about October 31, 2011, and at times prior thereto, there was no diagonal bracing in both directions on the inside face of the double-pole scaffold. Employees were on the top scaffold platform to apply a finish coat to the retaining wall and were exposed to a fall from a height of about 18.66 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2040
1926.452 A04
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,040 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(a)(4): Diagonal bracing in both directions was not installed across the entire outside face of all double- and single-pole scaffolds: (a) At the project on or about October 31, 2011, and at times prior thereto, there was no diagonal bracing in both directions on the outside face of the double-pole scaffold. Employees were on the top scaffold platform to apply a finish coat to the retaining wall and were exposed to a fall from a height of about 18.66 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2040
1926.452 A07
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,040 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(a)(7): Runners were not supported by bearing blocks securely attached to the poles: (a) At the project on or about October 31, 2011, and at times prior thereto, the runners were not supported by bearing blocks attached to the poles. Employees were on the top scaffold platform to apply a finish coat to the retaining wall and were exposed to a fall from a height of about 18.66 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2040
1926.452 A08
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,040 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(a)(8): Braces, bearers, and runners shall not be spliced between poles: (a) At the project on or about October 31, 2011, and at times prior thereto, the runners were spliced between the poles. Employees were on the top scaffold platform to apply a finish coat to the retaining wall and were exposed to a fall from a height of about 18.66 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2040
1926.95 A
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact: (a) At the project on or about October 31, 2011, and at times prior thereto, eye protection was not worn while Portland cement was applied as a finish coat to a vertical retaining wall.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Eureka Construction Corporation
View Eureka Construction Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238110)
More inspections in GU
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331083238.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.