Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CANTON CONSTRUCTION CORP.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CANTON CONSTRUCTION CORP. in FENCE PROJECT AT GUAM BEACH FRONT RESIDENCES 825 PALE SAN VITORES ROAD, TUMON, TAMUNING, GU 96913 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 331087593.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Canton Construction Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Canton Construction Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
FENCE PROJECT AT GUAM BEACH FRONT RESIDENCES 825 PALE SAN VITORES ROAD, TUMON
City
TAMUNING
State
GU
ZIP
96913
Mailing
PO BOX 25814 GMF, BARRIGADA, GU 96921
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.303 C03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Jan 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,530 · Current $667 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.303(c)(3): All other portable abrasive wheels used for external grinding, were not provided with safety guards (protection hoods) meeting the requirements of paragraph (c)(5) of this section:    (a) At the project on or about November 8, 2011, there was no belly guard for a 4 inch diameter abrasive wheel on a 110 VAC DeWalt right angle grinder.  Employees used the grinder to grind down burrs on the steel fence and to cut the steel fence.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $666.67
  • — Z (S) $1530

1926.351 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Jan 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,530 · Current $667 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.351(b)(1): All arc welding and cutting cables were not of the completely insulated, flexible type, capable of handling the maximum current requirements of the work in progress, taking into account the duty cycle under which the arc welder or cutter was working:    (a) At the project on or about November 8, 2011, 2, 10 gauge TTW wires were used to directly connect a portable 220 VAC electric welder to a disconnect box's terminals  Instead of a flexible cord, connected to the welder, with a plug to insert into an outlet.  The 10 gauge TTW wires lay on the asphalt between the disconnect box and the 220 VAC welder.  TTW wires were designed to be installed inside conduit, electrical boxes, and other electrical enclosures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $666.67
  • — Z (S) $1530

1926.351 B03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Jan 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,530 · Current $667 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.351(b)(3): When it became necessary to connect or splice lengths of cable one to another, substantial insulated connectors of a capacity at least equivalent to that of the cable not used. When connections were effected by means of cable lugs, they were not securely fastened together to give good electrical contact, and the exposed metal parts of the lugs were not completely insulated:    (a) At the project on or about November 8, 2011, the splice on a welding cable a 220 VAC welder was not guarded against accidental contact.  The leads were spliced together with a metal clamp, and there was no electrical tape or other form of insulation on the clamp.  The welding leads lay on the asphalt between the welder and welding holders.  Employees walked by the cable with the metal fence posts and railings.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $666.67
  • — Z (S) $1530

1926.403 I02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Jan 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,530 · Current $667 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.403(i)(2)(i): Except as required or permitted elsewhere in this subpart, live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more was not guarded against accidental contact by cabinets or other forms of enclosures, or by any of the following means:    (a) On the exterior wall of the condominium on or about November 8, 2011, the blades and terminals in a disconnect box were energized at 110 VAC and were not guarded against contact.  The cover of the disconnect box was opened to allow wires from an electric welder to be connected directly to the terminals inside the disconnect box.  The bottom of the disconnect box was 6 feet from the asphalt below.  Employees carried and worked on steel fence rails and posts near the opened disconnect box.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $666.67
  • — Z (S) $1530

1926.451 C02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Jan 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,530 · Current $667 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(ii): Unstable objects shall not be used to support scaffolds or platform units.    (a) At the project on or about November 8, 2011, there was no acceptable means of access to a scaffold platform that was about 3 feet high.  The platform consisted of 2, 28 inch wide pick boards.  The ends of the pick boards were placed on a pallet that leaned against a concrete wall.  The other ends of the pick boards were placed on a gurney.  There was no means to lock the wheels on the gurney.  A 6 foot long step ladder in the folded up position was on the platform and leaned against the 7.5 foot high concrete wall.  Employees were installing a fence on top of the concrete wall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $666.67
  • — Z (S) $1530

1926.451 F15

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Jan 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(15): Ladders shall not be used on scaffolds to increase the working level height of employees, except on large area scaffolds where employers have satisfied the following criteria:    (a) At the project on or about November 8, 2011, there was no acceptable means of access to a scaffold platform that was about 3 feet high.  The platform consisted of 2, 28 inch wide pick boards.  The ends of the pick boards were placed on a pallet that leaned against a concrete wall.  The other ends of the pick boards were placed on a gurney.  There was no means to lock the wheels on the gurney.  A 6 foot long step ladder in the folded up position was on the platform and leaned against the 7.5 foot high concrete wall.  Employees were installing a fence on top of the concrete wall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F15 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Jan 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(15)(i): When the ladder was placed against a structure which was not a part of the scaffold, the scaffold was not secured against the sideways thrust exerted by the ladder:    (a) At the project on or about November 8, 2011, there was no acceptable means of access to a scaffold platform that was about 3 feet high.  The platform consisted of 2, 28 inch wide pick boards.  The ends of the pick boards were placed on a pallet that leaned against a concrete wall.  The other ends of the pick boards were placed on a gurney.  There was no means to lock the wheels on the gurney.  A 6 foot long step ladder in the folded up position was on the platform and leaned against the 7.5 foot high concrete wall.  Employees were installing a fence on top of the concrete wall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F15 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Jan 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(15)(ii): The platform units were not secured to the scaffold to prevent their movement:    (a) At the project on or about November 8, 2011, there was no acceptable means of access to a scaffold platform that was about 3 feet high.  The platform consisted of 2, 28 inch wide pick boards.  The ends of the pick boards were placed on a pallet that leaned against a concrete wall.  The other ends of the pick boards were placed on a gurney.  There was no means to lock the wheels on the gurney.  A 6 foot long step ladder in the folded up position was on the platform and leaned against the 7.5 foot high concrete wall.  Employees were installing a fence on top of the concrete wall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F15 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Jan 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(15)(iii): The ladder legs were not on the same platform or other means were not provided to stabilize the ladder against unequal platform deflection:    (a) At the project on or about November 8, 2011, there was no acceptable means of access to a scaffold platform that was about 3 feet high.  The platform consisted of 2, 28 inch wide pick boards.  The ends of the pick boards were placed on a pallet that leaned against a concrete wall.  The other ends of the pick boards were placed on a gurney.  There was no means to lock the wheels on the gurney.  A 6 foot long step ladder in the folded up position was on the platform and leaned against the 7.5 foot high concrete wall.  Employees were installing a fence on top of the concrete wall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F15 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Jan 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(15)(iv): The ladder legs were not secured to prevent them from slipping or being pushed off the platform:    (a) At the project on or about November 8, 2011, there was no acceptable means of access to a scaffold platform that was about 3 feet high.  The platform consisted of 2, 28 inch wide pick boards.  The ends of the pick boards were placed on a pallet that leaned against a concrete wall.  The other ends of the pick boards were placed on a gurney.  There was no means to lock the wheels on the gurney.  A 6 foot long step ladder in the folded up position was on the platform and leaned against the 7.5 foot high concrete wall.  Employees were installing a fence on top of the concrete wall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Jan 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,530 · Current $667 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were not used only for the purpose for which they were designed:    (a) At the project on or about November 8, 2011, an 8 foot long step ladder was used in the folded up position and leaned against the concrete wall.  Employees used the ladders to install a fence on top of the 7.5 foot high concrete wall.  An employee was on the 6th rung from the bottom of the 8 foot long ladder.  The bottom of the 8 foot long ladder was on the asphalt surface below.     (b)   At the project on or about November 8, 2011, a 6 foot long step ladder were used in the folded up position and leaned against the concrete wall.  Employees used the ladders to install a fence on top of the 7.5 foot high concrete wall.  An employee was on the 4th rung from the bottom of the 6 foot long ladder.  The bottom of the 6 foot long ladder was on a platform that was about three feet high.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $666.65
  • — Z (S) $1530

1926.451 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Jan 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms are more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface were not used:\    (a) At the project on or about November 8, 2011, there was no acceptable means of access to a scaffold platform that was about 3 feet high.  The platform consisted of 2, 28 inch wide pick boards.  The ends of the pick boards were placed on a pallet that leaned against a concrete wall.  The other ends of the pick boards were placed on a gurney.  There was no means to lock the wheels on the gurney.  A 6 foot long step ladder in the folded up position was on the platform and leaned against the 7.5 foot high concrete wall.  Employees were installing a fence on top of the concrete wall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Canton Construction Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331087593.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.